┬ę Borgis - Postŕpy Nauk Medycznych 3/2013, s. 220-223
W┼éadys┼éaw Grzeszczak1, *Edward Franek2, 3
Badania przesiewowe w rozpoznaniu wczesnej fazy cukrzycowej choroby nerek
Screening for diagnosis of early stages of diabetic kidney disease
1Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice
Head of Department: prof. W┼éadys┼éaw Grzeszczak, MD, PhD
2Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Diabetology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior, Warszawa
Head of Department: prof. Edward Franek, MD, PhD
3Department of Human Epigenetics, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa
Head of Department: prof. Monika Puzianowska-Ku┼║nicka, MD, PhD
Wczesne rozpoznanie nefropatii cukrzycowej wydaje si─Ö by─ç wa┼╝nym elementem diagnostyki chorych na cukrzyc─Ö. Pozwala ono na wczesne wdro┼╝enie leczenia nefroprotekcyjnego, a co za tym idzie, zmniejszenie progresji choroby nerek (PChN) i zmniejszenie ryzyka sercowo-naczyniowego zwi─ůzanego z PChN. Poni┼╝sza praca omawia mo┼╝liwo┼Ťci bada┼ä przesiewowych – ocen─Ö wydalania albumin z moczem i ocen─Ö tzw. wczesnej utraty czynno┼Ťci nerek. W pracy podano r├│┼╝ne definicje mikroalbuminurii i makroalbuminurii (bia┼ékomoczu) u┼╝ywane w praktyce klinicznej, a tak┼╝e praktyczne wskaz├│wki dotycz─ůce pobierania pr├│bek moczu i ich przechowywania. Podano tak┼╝e definicj─Ö wczesnej utraty funkcji nerek. Czytelnik znajdzie tu tak┼╝e praktyczny algorytm, mog─ůcy znale┼║─ç zastosowanie w badaniach przesiewowych w kierunku nefropatii cukrzycowej. W ko┼äcu, podano tak┼╝e czynniki mog─ůce prowadzi─ç do fa┼észywie dodatniego rozpoznania, kt├│re musz─ů by─ç wzi─Öte pod uwag─Ö w praktyce.
Early diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy seems to be an important part of the evaluation of patients with diabetes. It allows early nephroprotective treatment and makes possible resulting decrease of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and attenuation of CKD-related cardiovascular risk. The following paper describes possibilities of screening: assessment of urinary albumin excretion and assessment of so called early kidney function loss. Different definitions of microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (proteinuria) used in clinical practice are specified, along with practical advices regarding urine sample collection and storage. A definition of early renal function loss is also given. The reader will find also a practical algorithm that may be used for screening of diabetic nephropathy. At last, factors leading to falsely positive diagnosis, that need to be taken into account in practice are listed.
Early stage of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) may often be asymptomatic. It may be classified as 1st or 2nd stage of diabetic nephropathy according to old Mogensen classification, manifesting itsef only as hyperfiltration with or without histopathological changes (like thickening of glomerular basement membrane and mesangial expansion). In this stages, however, microalbuminuria is not present and as kidney function is often normal (or GFR may even be increased because of hyperfiltration) the clinical diagnosis may be not easy, although increased urinary albumin excretion below the microalbuminuria range may happen and may suggest the diagnosis.
Additionally, as shown in many recent publications, in patients with diabetes an early loss of the glomerular filtration may occur. It could be defined as accelerated decrease of kidney function, which happens in 9-32% of patients even before the development of microalbuminuria, and in 31-42% in patients with microalbuminuria but no overt proteinuria (1, 2). The decrease of renal function (GFR) is often defined as being higher then 3.3% per year. Such GFR decrease is rather easy to find, as in a vast majority of patients serum creatinine is regularly assessed and eGFR calculated.
As it seems therefore, an early diagnostic of and screening for DKD must involve an assessment of urinary albumin excretion rate as well as of GFR decrease. Both examination must be performed in a prospective manner in given time intervals.
Microalbuminuria is defined as urinary albumin excretion (UAE) higher or equal then 30 mg/d but not higher then 300 mg/d (3, 4) in 24 hour-sterile urine sample, collected in a standardized manner. If UAE is lower then 30 mg/24 h, it is regarded as normal (although it is suggested that cardiovascular risk may increase with albuminuria increasing even in the normal range). Other definitions of micro- and macroalbuminuria are shown in the table 1.
Table 1. Classification of albuminuria.
|Urinary albumin excretion (UAE) (mg/24 h)||< 30||30-300||> 300|
|UAE (μg/min)||< 20||20-200||> 200|
|Urinary albumin/creatinine rate (UACR) (mg/g)|
In the physiology, albumin is filtrated in the kidney by glomeruli and reabsorbed in the tubuli, although a small amount of albumin may be excreted (in healthy adult it is about 7-10 mg per day (5), or 6-7 μg/min (6)). The excretion of albumnin is not stable. Results may change in time and, additionally, may be influenced by many factors, listed in table 2.
Table 2. Factors and diseases influencing albuminuria and potentially causing microalbuminuria (based on 5, 7, 8).
|Acute and chronic infections (urinary tract infections)|
Intensive physical exercise
Blood pressure increase (non-dippers)
Severe heart failure
Urological disease (neurogenic bladder, prostate diseases)
Diseases of blood vessels (diffuse atherosclerotic lesions, renal artery stenosis)
Chronic kidney diseases (glomerulonephritis, interstitial disease)
The above statements implicates that single assessment of albuminuria is diagnostically unreliable. This fact is also recognized by different guidelines, that make a diagnosis of microalbuminuria possible only when 2 of three different urine samples collected within 3-6 months period, confirm the diagnosis (9). An algorithm that may be useful in diagnosing microalbuminuria, is shown on figure 1. It should be stressed that the diagnosis of diabetic microalbuminuria (i.e. DKD) is possible only after exclusion of other reasons of increased urinary albumin excretion.
Fig. 1. Diagnosis of early stages of diabetic nephropathy based on albuminuria. AER – albumin excretion rate.
Increased UAE may be estimated uusing different methods: immunoenzymatic (ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), radioimmune (RIA, radio-immuno assay), chromatographic (HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography), immunoturbidometric, immunodiffusion or by immunoblothing.
Golden standard in the diagnostics of albuminuria is based on its estimation in 24-hour urine (5), however, as correlation of the results with the results achieved in the morning urine sample is high (10), the latter method, as more comfortable, is often used for screening. Screening is than often performed using morning urine, and using semiquantitative strip tests. If the result is in the normal range the test should be repeated after one year. If the screening is positive, at first a presence of all factors or diseases that may have influenced it (listed in table 2) should be excluded. Next, albuminuria should be assessed using one of the mentioned above quantitative methods. The positive results must be confirmed, according to guidelines, by at least one additional positive results out of two, performed after 3-6 months.
Assessment of albuminuria should be assessed directly after urine collection, however it is acceptable to performed it within 3 days (if stored in 4°C) or 2 weeks (if stored in – 20°C) (11), avoiding estimation in urine of ph of 5,5 or lower (12).
A persistent significant albuminuria indicates increased vessels’ permaeability and may be regarded as an early sign of a dysfunction of glomerular arterioles and, therefore, as an early sign of DKD (13). It should be remembered, however, that significant microalbuminuria may be present in 2.2-9.4% of healthy subjects aged 50+ (14, 15), although even in these healthy subjects a cardiovascular risk is greater, if albuminuria is higher than 7.5 μg/min (15).
In patients with type 1 diabetes microalbuminuria appears in parallel to other signs of endothelial damage: hypertension and retinopathy. In patients with type 2 diabetes, microalbuminuria may also reflect a generalized endothelial dysfunction. However, as hypertension appears in those subjects often many years before nephropathy, and often even before diabetes is diagnosed, diabetic retinopathy is much more reliable marker confirming that nephropathy is of diabetic origin. If no retinopathy is present, other than diabetic causes of albuminuria should be excluded.
The possibility of presence of non-diabetic micro- or macroalbuminuria should be however regarded not only in such case. Other suggestive signs are:
– Fast progression of albuminuria/proteinuria in the absence of hypertension or in subjects with well-controlled blood pressure and well-controlled glycemia.
– No improvement of albuminuria/proteinuria in spite of normalization of blood pressure and improvement of glycemic control.
– Fast progression of GFR decrease.
In such cases a fast referral to a nephrologist is necessary. In some cases kidney biopsy cannot be avoided.
According to the guidelines of Polish Society of Diabetology, screening of UAE should be performed in all patients with type 1 diabetes in whom the time of the disease duration exceeds 5 years (9), it should be however mentioned that if the time of the disease is longer than 3 years, already 6.4% of in those patients have microalbuminuria (16). In 18% of patients with type 2 diabetes microalbuminuria is present already at the diagnosis (18). Therefore screening should start immediately after it.
EARLY KIDNEY FUNCTION LOSS
The possibility of this other than microalbuminuria manifestation of early stage of DKD, defined as progession of a GFR decrease faster than 3.3% per year, was recognized only in the recent years. In the first publication regarding this issue (1) the authors focused on fast kidney function loss in some microalbuminuric patients. It was additionally concluded that GFR loss is not necessarily connected with albumin loss. That would mean that a hypothesis stating that a decrease of renal function is rather secondary to microalbuminuria (as in the Mogensen classification) may be not always true.
The implication of this would be that screening for microalbuminuria may be not sufficient for diagnosis of early stages of DKD and serum creatinine estimation is also necessary for this purpose. Indeed, the guidelines recommend once-a-year creatinine estimation regardless from UAE (9). It is questionable, however, which formula should be used to eGFR calculation. It seems that the MDRD formula is easier to get from the laboratory as the Cockroft-Gault formula (although better in obese patients (18) usually must be calculated by the doctor. The future may belong to the CKD-EPI formula, which may be useful in estimating the precise GFR if the value is over 60 ml/min. It should be remembered that both MDRD and CKD-EPI formulas may lower the GFR about 20% (19).
In the next years more and more attention will probably be paid to uric acid estimations. It seems that higher uric acid concentration may predict an early kidney function loss in diabetes, identifying very early patients at risk (20).
1. Perkins BA, Ficociello LH, Ostrander BE et al.: Microalbuminuria and the risk for early progressive renal function decline in type 1 diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 1353-1361.
2. Pavkov ME, Knowler WC, Lemley KV et al.: Early renal function decline in type 2 diabetes. Clin J Am Soc Nephr 2011 (epub ahead of print).
3. Breyer JA: Diabetic nephropathy in insulin-dependent patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1992; 20: 533-547.
4. Ritz E, Stefa┼äski A: Diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes. Am J Kidney Dis 1996; 27: 167-194.
5. Ganz M, Proetzsch R, Hasslacher C: Screening for and diagnosis of incipient diabetic nephropathy (IDN) in diabetes. [In:] Hasslacher C (ed.:) Diabetic nephropathy. John Willey & Sons, 2001: 117-127.
6. Scott LJ, Warram JH, Hanna LS et al.: A nonlinear effect of hyperglycemia and current cigarette smoking are major determinants of the onset of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2002; 50: 2842-2849.
7. Grzeszczak W: Nefropatia cukrzycowa. Via Medica, Gda┼äsk 2003.
8. Czekalski S: Nefropatia cukrzycowa. [In:] Ksi─ů┼╝ek A, Rutkowski B: Nefrologia. Czelej, Lublin 2004: 346-371.
9. Zalecenia kliniczne dotycz─ůce post─Öpowania u chorych na cukrzyc─Ö typu 2. Stanowisko PTD. Diabetologia Kliniczna 2012; 1 (Supl. A): A1-52.
10. Hasslacher C: Microalbuminurie-Sreening bei Diabetikern. Dtsch Med Wsch 1989; 114: 980-982.
11. Grzeszczak W: P├│┼║ny okres nefropatii i leczenie nerkozast─Öpcze. [In:] Tato┼ä J i Czech A: Diabetologia. PZWL, 2001: 176-195.
12. Townsend JC, Sadler WA, Shanks GM: The effect of storage pH on the precipitation of proteins in deep-frozen urine sample. Ann Clin Biochem 1987; 24: 111-113.
13. Hasslacher C, Danne T, Ganz M: Fr├╝hdiagnose der diabetischen Nephropathie-Stellungnahme der Arbeitsgemeinschaft „Diabetische Nephropathie“. Diabetol Informat 1997; 4: 268-273.
14. Zavaroni I, Bonini L, Gasparini P: Dissociation between urinary albumin excretion and variables associated with insulin resistance in a healthy population. J Int Med 1996; 240: 151-156.
15. Yudkin JS, Forrest RD, Jackson CA: Microalbuminuria as a predictor of vascular disease in non – diabetic subjects. Lancet 1998; 11: 530-533.
16. Cooper ME: Pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Lancet 1998; 352: 213-219.
17. Seaquist ER, Goetz FC, Ricks S, Barbosa J: Familiar clustering of diabetic nephropathy. New Engl J Med 1989; 320: 1161-1165.
18. Drion I, Joosten H, Santing L et al.: The cockroft-gault: a better predictor of renal function in an overweight and obese diabetic population. Obes Facts 2011; 4: 393-399.
19. Silveiro SP, Araujo GN, Ferreira MN et al.: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation pronouncedly underestimates glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 2353-2355.
20. Allison SJ: Serum uric acid level is associated with early GFR loss in type 1 diabetes. Nature Rev Nephrol 2010; 6: 446.