© Borgis - New Medicine 3/1999, s. 4-5
Maria Bączek, Elżbieta Hassmann-Poznańska
Nasal airway dimensions in children, measured by acoustic rhinometry
Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Białystok, Poland
Head of Dept.: Prof. Elżbieta Hassmann-Poznańska, M.D.
The aim of the study was assessment of nasal patency and determination of age related normal values of MCA and TMCA in children.
Forty-two healthy children age 0-15 years were examined. In the group of neonates MCA was below 0.1 cm. In the 3-15 year group minimal cross - sectional area at on the level of the head of the inferior concha. All examined parameters showed continuous growth with age.
Acoustic rhinometry is a useful method of assessing nasal patency in children.
Acoustic rhinometry is a new non-invasive method of measuring the patency of the nasal airway. The nasal geometry is assessed by comparison of an acoustic signal with its reflection from within the nose. The technigue is easy to perform and requires little cooperation from the patient. Measurements by acoustic rhinometry are highly reproducible.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry in children, as well as to present normal values for the minimal cross-sectional area and nasal cavity volume in different age groups.
Materials and methods
A total of 42 children aged between 0 and 15 years were examined. The children were divided into three age groups
I - age 0-1 year - 10 children
II - age 5-10 years - 19 children
III - age 10-15 years - 13 children.
All subjects were evaluated using endoscopic examination to exclude the presence of abnormal nasal patency due to rhinitis, adenoidal hypertrophy, or a deviated septum.
Nasal patency was assessed using a wide-band noise rhinometer RHIN 2000/2001 (RhinoMetrics A/S, Lynge Denmark).
In group I a miniprobe and in groups II and III a standard tube, were used.
The examinations were carried out according to the standardized procedure proposed by Tomkinson and Eccles (5).
In order to simplify the analysis the following dimensions were calculated;
MCAR - minimal cross-sectional area, right side
MCAL - minimal cross-sectional area, left side
TMCA - total minimal cross-sectional area
DMCA - distance from the nostril to the MCA
TVOL45 - total volume of the anterior 45 mm of the -nasal airway.
Groups II and III
MCA1R - cross-sectional area of the first minimum, -right side
MCA1L - cross-sectional area of the first minimum, -left side
TMCA1 - total cross-sectional area of the first minimum,
DMCA1 - distance from the nostril to the MCA1
MCA2R - cross-sectional area of the second minimum, -right side
MCA2L - cross-sectional area of the second minimum, -left side
DMCA2 - distance from the nostril to the MCA2
TVOL60 - total volume of the anterior 60 mm of the -nasal airway.
Rhinometric curves obtained from the infants by means of the miniprobe revealed only one minimum localized 0,63 ą 0,19 mm from the nostrils. The results of measurements are presented in table 1.
Table 1. Rhinometric values from the children in group I. Values given as mean ±SD with range in parentheses.
0.09 ? 0.02 (0.07-0.11)
0.18 ? 0.04 (0.10-0.26)
0.63 ? 0.19 (0.22-1.04)
|TVOL 45 (cm3)||2.28 ± 0.49
Powyżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu, do którego możesz uzyskać pełny dostęp.
Płatny dostęp do wszystkich zasobów Czytelni Medycznej
1. Djupesland P.G., Lyholm B.: Nasal airway dimensions in term neonates measured by continuous wide-band noise acoustic rhinometry. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 1997, 424. 2. Djupesland P.G., et al.: Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of congenital choanal malformations. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol, 1997, 41:319. 3. Riechelmann H., et al.: Acoustic rhinometry in pre-school children. Clin. Otolaryngol, 1993, 18:272. 4. Samoliński B.: Analiza wyników rynometrii akustycznej na potrzeby diagnostyki rynoalergologicznej. Praca habilitacyjna z Katedry i Kliniki AM w Warszawie, 1998. 5. Tomkinson A. Eccles R.: Acoustic rhinometry: do we need a standardized operating procedure? Clin. Otolaryngol 1996, 21:284-287.