Jestem lekarzem, farmaceutą lub osobą prowadzącą obrót produktami leczniczymi

Ponad 7000 publikacji medycznych!
Statystyki za 2021 rok:
odsłony: 8 805 378
Artykuły w Czytelni Medycznej o SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19
© Borgis - New Medicine 4/2023, s. 127-132 | DOI: 10.25121/NewMed.2023.27.4.127
*Agata Gierlotka, Magdalena Kokoszka, Grzegorz Dawiec, Jerzy Dutka, Dorota Gorny, Ireneusz Bielecki
Esthesioneuroblastoma in children and adolescent – a systemic review
Estesioneuroblastoma w populacji dziecięcej – przegląd literatury
Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Silesian Health Centre for Child in Katowice, Poland
Head of Department: Associate Professor Ireneusz Bielecki, MD, PhD
Streszczenie
Estesioneuroblastoma, zwana inaczej nerwiakiem węchowym zarodkowym, jest nowotworem złośliwym wywodzącym się z komórek nabłonka węchowego. Etiologia jest nieznana. Nowotwór długo rozwija się bezobjawowo. Guz rośnie ekspansywnie, penetrując do zatok nosowych, jamy nosowej, oczodołu i przedniego dołu czaszki. Do najczęstszych dolegliwości zgłaszanych przez pacjentów należą: uczucie jednostronnej blokady nosa (70%), krwawienia z nosa (50%), ból twarzy, zaburzenia widzenia, brak/osłabienie węchu, nadmierne łzawienie oraz objawy neurologiczne związane z naciekaniem struktur przedniego dołu czaszki. Diagnostyka opiera się na endoskopii jam nosa, badaniach obrazowych (tomografia komputerowa i rezonans magnetyczny) oraz weryfikacji histopatologicznej. Leczenie w zależności od stopnia zaawansowania polega na chirurgicznym usunięciu guza, radioterapii i chemioterapii. Przeprowadzono dogłębną analizę literatury opisującej pacjentów pediatrycznych leczonych z powodu nerwiaka węchowego zarodkowego. Wyniki ograniczyliśmy do publikacji z lat 2013-2023. W 12 artykułach oceniono łącznie 83 pacjentów. Przedział wiekowy wynosił od 0,6 roku do 21 lat. Przeanalizowano przebieg kliniczny, objawy, diagnostykę, leczenie i rokowanie pacjentów z rozpoznaną estesioneuroblastomą.
Summary
Esthesioneuroblastoma, or olfactory neuroblastoma, is a rare malignant neoplasm of the sinonasal tract originating from the olfactory neuroepithelium. It most often presents in the superior nasal cavity. The etiology of esthesioneuroblastoma is still unknown. The cancer develops asymptomatically for a long time. The most common complaints reported by patients include a feeling of unilateral nasal blockage (70%), nosebleeds (50%), facial pain, visual disturbances, lack or weakness of smell, excessive tearing and neurological symptoms associated with infiltration of structures of the anterior cranial fossa. Endoscopic surgery with or without craniotomy is the first choice treatment. The majority of these patients are also treated with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. A comprehensive literature search was performed. We limited results to publication from 2013-2023. In 12 articles a total of 83 patients were evaluated. Age range was 0,6 year to 21 years. The clinical course, symptoms, diagnostics, treatment and outcomes were analyzed.
Słowa kluczowe: estesioneuroblastoma, nerwiak węchowy zarodkowy, operacja podstawy czaszki u dzieci, endoskopia podstawy czaszki, guz podstawy czaszki, pediatryczna operacja podstawy czaszki, rak głowy i szyi, rak podstawy czaszki
Introduction
Esthesioneuroblastoma, otherwise known as embryonal olfactory neuroblastoma, is a malignant neoplasm derived from olfactory epithelial cells (neuroectodermal cells). These cells are typically located in the upper part of the nasal cavity, including the superior nasal turbinate, the superior part of the septum, on the roof of the nasal cavity (cribriform plate). The tumor is very rare in the pediatric population with a frequency of < 0.1 per 100,000 (1). It is diagnosed in any age group, however, 2 peaks of incidence are found – the first in young adults up to 20 years of age and the second peak between 50-60 years of age (2). The cancer develops asymptomatically for a long time. The most common complaints reported by patients include a feeling of unilateral nasal blockage (70%), nosebleeds (50%), facial pain, visual disturbances, lack/weakness of smell, excessive tearing and neurological symptoms associated with infiltration of structures of the anterior cranial fossa. Although the tumor originates from the olfactory epithelium, anosmia is a rare symptom occurring in only 5% of patients (1, 3, 4). The tumor grows expansively penetrating into the nasal sinuses, nasal cavity, orbit and anterior cranial fossa and does not differ in appearance from other nasal neoplasms however often endoscopic examination alone does not reveal any proliferative changes (3). Cases of neuroblastoma accompanied by paraneoplastic syndromes in the form of Cushing’s syndrome with excessive ACTH levels, malignant hypercalcemia, and hyponatremia caused by excess vasopressin are also described (5-8). Infiltration of anterior cranial fossa and orbital structures is found in 10% of adults and about 50% of children with esthesioneuroblastoma (9). Lymph node metastases are present in 8-10% of patients at the time of diagnosis (10). The primary diagnosis is based on endoscopic examination of the nasal cavities, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The differential diagnosis should consider striated cell sarcoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, Ewing tumor, inverted papilloma, hemangioma, low-differentiated carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, melanoma and meningioma (11, 12). The disease progresses more aggressively in the pediatric population compared to the adult group. Treatment, depending on the stage, consists of surgical removal of the tumor, radiation therapy and chemotherapy (13).
Material and methods
A comprehensive literature search was performed using the databases of PubMed and The Cochrane Library. Our search terms and medical subject headings (MeSH) were: esthesioneuroblastoma AND child(ren) OR pediatric AND English (language). We limited results to publication from 2013-2023. All articles that addressed the topic were screened by full text review. Inclusion criteria were: cases diagnosed and pathology-confirmed as esthesioneuroblastoma, cases in pediatric population up to 21 years of age, details of cases available and english language of publications. Only manuscripts evaluating pediatric esthesioneuroblastoma exclusively were included to prevent ambiguity of data from series that included both pediatric and adult patients. The remaining articles meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Results
The initial database query identified 58 articles, with 12 meeting inclusion criteria. In 12 articles (14-25) a total of 83 patients were evaluated. Male group counted 32 boys and female group gathered 51 girls. Male to female ratio was 1:1.59. Age range was 0,6 year to 21 years (tab. 1). All studies were retrospective case series. Nasal obstruction was the most common presenting symptom, followed by headache, epistaxis and visual disturbance. Ophthalmic disorders included visual disturbance, proptosis, diplopia, tearing, decreased visual acuity and blindness. Patients also complained of neck swelling, recurrent sinus infections, allergic symptoms, facial swelling, dizziness, anosmia, nausea, vomiting and seizures. In diagnostic all patients underwent computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The extent of oncological process was categorized provide Kadish staging (tab. 2). 2.4% (2/83) of patients were Kadish A, 25.2% (21/83) were Kadish B, 55.4% (46/83) were Kadish C, and 17% (14/83) were Kadish D. Cervical lymph node metastases were found in 17% (14/83) of patients. Histological examination and immunohistochemical analysis of the biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of olfactory neuroblastoma. Most patients received surgery and/or chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. 47% patients (n = 40) was treated with triple modality therapy (surgery + radiation + chemotherapy). Treatment parameters are summarized in table 3. Chemotherapy included cisplatin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamid, carboplatin and etoposide. These therapies were based on the chemotherapy protocols set in place at each institution or country. Seventy children received proton therapy with median radiation dose of 50-60 Gray (Gy) and 1 boy was treated with palliative radiotherapy. Surgical resection was performed as endoscopic endonasal resection or craniofacial resection with or without reconstruction. 24% patients died (n = 20). Overall survival rates were 86%.
Tab. 1. Demographic characteristics
 NAge (years)MaleFemaleKadish stage
Venkatramani et al. 2015 (14)2414 (range 0.6-20) 618B-8
C-16
Kababri et al. 2014 (15)1114 (range 0.8-18) 38B-5
C-6
Drescher et al. 2024 (16)1516 (range: 3-21)78B-2
C-9
D-4
Lucas et al. 2015 (17)84.6 (range 0.8-9.4)26B-3
C-1
D-4
Dumont et al. 2020 (18)1812.2 (range 0.9-18)108A-1
B-3
C-10 D-4
Jo et al. 2016 (19)1610D
Shahriari et al. 2017 (20)11.7501C
Pacino et al. 2020 (21)11601C
McDowell et al. 2020 (22)11501C
Penzhorn et al. 2022 (23)11710D
Özhan et al. 2023 (24) 10.810A
Dimassi et al. 2017 (25)11310C
Tab. 2. Kaddish staging
Kaddish Staging
Atumor confined to nasal cavity
Binvolvement of one or more paranasal sinuses
Cextension beyond the paranasal sinuses involving cribriform plate, skull base, or orbit
Dregional lymph node or distant metastasis
Tab. 3. Treatment modality
Treatment modality N
surgery2
chemotherapy1
chemotherapy + radiation therapy6
surgery + radiation therapy24
surgery + chemotherapy9
radiation therapy1
triple modality therapy 40
Discussion
The extensive progression of the cancer at the moment of setting the diagnosis is due to the slow growth of the tumor, the long asymptomatic period and the frequent normal picture of the nasal cavities on endoscopy. At the time of diagnosis, 20.2% of patients are already found to have lymph node metastases (1). Tumors are unilateral, polypoid, soft, grayish-red, well vascularized and covered with unaltered mucosa therefore endoscopic examination of a patient with a tumor may reflect normal (26). Esthesioneuroblastoma gives distant metastasis via blood and lymphatic vessels (27). Perineural spread of the tumor has also been described (28). Lymphatic metastasis is most often localized in cervical lymph nodes of group II (90%), I and III (50%) and pharyngeal nodes (40%). Region IV and V are involved in metastasis only in extensive nodal spread (29). Distant metastases are found in the lungs, liver, bones, marrow and meninges (30). Highly differentiated tumors are associated with a higher likelihood of meningeal metastases, while low-differentiated tumors are more likely to progress with local aggression (31). The classification of tumor progression was first developed by Kaddish. It is based on infiltration of adjacent anatomical structures. Advanced stage A refers to tumor confined to the nasal cavity, stage B to the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, and stage C to spread beyond the scope of the nasal cavity and sinuses (32). Morita modified this scale by adding stage D – the presence of nodal or distant metastases (tab. 2) (33). 90% of patients at the time of diagnosis are already at stage B or C cancer according to Kaddish (1).
The primary diagnosis is based on endoscopic examination of the nasal cavities, computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CT images of the sinuses show an intranasal unilateral pathological polypoid mass emerging from the olfactory bulb, with possible enlargement of the structures of the olfactory organ system and spreading through the cribriform plate toward the anterior cranial fossa (28). Atypical, ectopic, isolated foci of esthesioneuroblastoma occurring in the sphenoid sinus and maxillary sinus have also been described in the literature (34, 35). Magnetic resonance imaging shows perineural spread of the tumor, infiltration of the meninges and subarachnoid space, and infiltration of intracranial structures. It also allows accurate assessment of orbital structures especially in MRI with the signal attenuation (saturation) technique of adipose tissue (FAT-SAT sequence) (28). Calcifications in the tumor mass and the co-occurrence of cysts are also typical of these tumors (36). PET-CT can identify the presence of 20% more metastases in the lymph nodes of the neck, which are not visualized on conventional CT (37). Cytogenetic findings show various aberrations of genetic material in tumor tissue. Genetic alterations are more numerous in well-differentiated esthesioneuroblastomas compared to low-differentiated tumors. Deletion of the entire chromosome 11 or deletion within the short arm of chromosome 1 (1p35-36) correlates with poor prognosis. Approximately 20% of tumors have mutations (amplification) of the N-myc protooncogene (MYCN) located on the short arm of chromosome 2 (38, 39). The immunohistochemical profile is characterized by positive staining for synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56, NSE, NFP and S-100 protein (40). Treatment, depending on the stage, consists of surgical removal of the tumor, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Endoscopic access surgery provides access to the skull base, orbit, sinuses, and allows surgery of the dura, olfactory nerve, olfactory bulb and even brain tissues. Combined access – endoscopic and external via craniotomy is required in high stages of disease (40, 41). The main adverse effects of surgical treatment include meningitis, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, bleeding in the postoperative period, chronic sinusitis, absence or impaired sense of smell and blindness (42). Radiation therapy is indicated in locally advanced tumors ineligible for radical removal, after non-radical surgical treatment or in cases of recurrence. Complications after radiation therapy can include endocrine and ocular disorders (cataracts, retinal fibrosis, retinopathy) (43). The radiation therapy treatment of the pediatric and young patient population carries a higher risk of second cancers induced by radiation. Radiation therapy causes damage to a single or both DNA strands, and this leads to mutations and developing cancer from the irradiated cell (44). There is a greater predisposition to radiation-induced cancers in the female population (45). In a study by Bonnecaze et al. 36% of stage C patients were treated with surgery with complementary radiotherapy, and patients with stage D advancement were treated with radiochemotherapy (48%). Generalized 10-year survival was achieved by 46-60% of patients (41). Chemotherapy reduces the risk of distant recurrence. The prognosis is serious with recurrence rates as high as 10.3% after surgical treatment, and 5-year survival rates as high as 44-91.1% (1, 46). According to stage, 5-year survival for Kadish A is 80%, for Kadish B – 87.7%, for Kadish C – 77% and for Kadish D – 49.5%. Long-term follow-up of patients is recommended because distant recurrences have been found even 10 years after treatment (47).
Piśmiennictwo
1. Safi C, Spielman D, Otten M, Bruce JN et al.: Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Pediatric Esthesioneuroblastoma: A Systematic Review. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 1247.
2. Liermann J, Syed M, Held T, Bernhardt D et al.: Advanced Radiation Techniques in the Treatment of Esthesioneuroblastoma: A 7-Year Single-Institution’s Clinical Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10(11).
3. Gondim J, Ramos FJ, Azevedo J et al.: Esthesioneuroblastoma: case report. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2002; 60(2-A): 303-307.
4. Ow TJ, Hanna EY, Roberts DB et al.: Optimization of long-term outcomes for patients with esthesioneuroblastoma: Treatment for Esthesioneuroblastoma. Head & Neck 2014; 36(4): 524-530.
5. Koo BK, An JH, Jeon KH et al.: Two Cases of Ectopic Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Syndrome with Olfactory Neuroblastoma and Literature Review. Endocrine Journal 2008; 55(3): 469-475.
6. Mayur N, Bordoni RE, Locandro D, McLaughlin M: Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic adrenocorticotrophic hormone production by olfactory neuroblastoma. Endocr Pract 2014; 20(3): e47-52.
7. Sharma S, Lasheen W, Walsh D: Paraneoplastic refractory hypercalcemia due to advanced metastatic esthesioneuroblastoma. Rhinology 2008; 46(2): 153-155.
8. Hoorn EJ, Monserez DA, Fenton RA et al.: Olfactory neuroblastoma with hyponatremia. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2014; 33(21): e88-e92.
9. Eich HT, Müller R-P, Micke O, Kocher M et al.: Esthesioneuroblastoma in Childhood and Adolescence: Better Prognosis with Multimodal Treatment? Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2005; 181(6): 378-384.
10. Howell MC, Branstetter BF, Snyderman CH: Patterns of Regional Spread for Esthesioneuroblastoma. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2011; 32(5): 929-933.
11. Lester DR. Thompson. Olfactory Neuroblastoma. Head and Neck Pathol (2009) 3:252–259 DOI 10.1007/s12105-009-0125-2.
12. Rampinelli V, Ferrari M, Nicolai P: Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract: an update. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 2018; 26(2): 115-121.
13. Burnham AJ, Burnham PA, Horwitz EM: Survival Associations between Patient Age and Treatment Modality in Olfactory Neuroblastoma: A Retrospective Population-Based Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10(12): 2685.
14. Venkatramani R, Pan H, Furman WL et al.: Multimodality Treatment of Pediatric Esthesioneuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2016; 63(3): 465-470.
15. Kababri ME, Habrand JL, Valteau-Couanet D et al.: Esthesioneuroblastoma in children and adolescent: experience on 11 cases with literature review. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2014; 36: 91-95.
16. Drescher NR, Indelicato DJ, Dagan R et al.: Outcomes following proton therapy for pediatric esthesioneuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024; 71(2): e30793.
17. Lucas JT Jr, Ladra MM, MacDonald SM et al.: Proton therapy for pediatric and adolescent esthesioneuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015; 62: 1523-1528.
18. Dumont B, Fresneau B, Claude L et al.: Pattern of loco-regional relapses and treatment in pediatric esthesioneuroblastoma: the french very rare tumors group (Fracture) contribution. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 13: e28154.
19. Jo HC, Lee SW, Jung HJ, Park JE: Esthesioneuroblastoma in a boy with 47, XYY karyotype. Korean J Pediatr 2016; 59(suppl. 1): S92-S95.
20. Shahriari M, Shakibazad N, Moradi M: Esthesioneuroblastoma Presenting with Bilateral Proptosis and Blindness in a Child: A Case Report. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11(8): XD01-XD02.
21. Pacino GA, Cocuzza S, Maniaci A et al.: Advanced olfactory neuroblastoma in a teenager: a clinical case and short review of literature. Childs Nerv Syst 2020; 36(3): 485-489.
22. McDowell MM, Roy S, Goldschmidt E et al.: Extensive tumor calcification in response to pre-operative reductive chemotherapy in pediatric esthesioneuroblastoma: a case report. Childs Nerv Syst 2020; 36(9): 2099-2102.
23. Penzhorn IH, Schubert PT: Metastatic olfactory neuroblastoma: A small round blue cell puzzle on fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2022; 50(1): E13-E17.
24. Özhan B, Çakar DY, Gülten G, Yalçın N: An exceptionally rare case of Cushing’s syndrome caused by ectopic ACTH syndrome due to olfactory neuroblastoma in childhood. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2023; 36(5): 513-516.
25. Dimassi H, Kedous S, Ben Said I: Sinonasal tumour presenting as status epilepticus in a child. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2017; 134(4): 285-286.
26. Ow TJ, Bell D, Kupferman ME et al.: Esthesioneuroblastoma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013; 24(1): 51-65.
27. Limaiem F, Das JM: Esthesioneuroblastoma. (Updated 2023 Jan 1). In: StatPearls (Internet). Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan.
28. Dumont B, Lemelle L, Cordero C et al.: Esthesioneuroblastoma in children, adolescents and young adults. Cancer 2020; 107(9): 934-945.
29. Schwartz JS, Palmer JN, Adappa ND: Contemporary management of esthesioneuroblastoma: Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 2016; 24(1): 63-69.
30. Dublin A, Bobinski M: Imaging Characteristics of Olfactory Neuroblastoma (Esthesioneuroblastoma). Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base 2015; 77(01): 001-005.
31. Czapiewski P, Kunc M, Haybaeck J: Genetic and molecular alterations in olfactory neuroblastoma – implications for pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment. Oncotarget 2016; 7(32): 52584-52596.
32. Kadish S, Goodman M, Wang CC: Olfactory neuroblastoma. A clinical analysis of 17 cases. Cancer 1976; 37: 1571-1576.
33. Morita A, Ebersold MJ, Olsen KD et al.: Esthesioneuroblastoma: prognosis and management. Neurosurgery 1993; 32(5): 706-715.
34. Wong E, Choroomi S, Palme CE, Singh NP.: Isolated primary maxillary sinus esthesioneuroblastoma presenting as idiopathic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone. BMJ Case Reports 2019; 12(5): e228666.
35. Zahedi FD, Gendeh BS, Husain S et al.: Ectopic Esthesioneuroblastoma of the Sphenoclivus: A Rare Entity. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2017; 69(1): 125-129.
36. Madani G, Beale TJ, Lund VJ: Imaging of Sinonasal Tumors. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2009; 30(1): 25-38.
37. Broski SM, Hunt CH, Johnson GB et al.: The Added Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Evaluation of Patients with Esthesioneuroblastoma. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2012; 53(8): 1200-1206.
38. Bockmühl U, You X, Pacyna-Gengelbach M et al.: CGH pattern of esthesioneuroblastoma and their metastases. Brain Pathol 2004; 14(2): 158-163.
39. Riazimand SH, Brieger J, Jacob R et al.: Analysis of cytogenetic aberrations in esthesioneuroblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2002; 136: 53-57.
40. Majchrzak E, Wegner A, Golusiński W: Trudności diagnostyczne chorego z guzem masywu szczękowo-sitowego; dylematy terapeutyczne. Otolaryngol Pol 2011; 65(5): 377-382.
41. De Bonnecaze G, Lepage B, Rimmer J et al.: Long-term carcinologic results of advanced esthesioneuroblastoma: a systematic review. European Archives of Oto-RhinoLaryngology 2016; 273(1): 21-26.
42. Spielman DB, Liebowitz A, Grewal M et al.: Exclusively endoscopic surgical resection of esthesioneuroblastoma: A systematic review. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 8(1): 66-72.
43. Cohen ZR, Marmor E, Fuller GN, Demonte F: Misdiagnosis of olfactory neuroblastoma. Neurosurgical focus 2002; 12(5): 1-6.
44. Morton LM, Onel K, Curtis RE et al.: The rising incidence of second cancers: patterns of occurrence and identification of risk factors for children and adults. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2014: e57-67.
45. Armstrong GT, Sklar CA, Hudson MM, Robison LL: Long-term health status among survivors of childhood cancer: does sex matter? J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4477-4489.
46. Patil VM, Joshi A, Noronha V et al.: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced and Borderline Resectable Nonsquamous Sinonasal Tumors (Esthesioneuroblastoma and Sinonasal Tumor with Neuroendocrine Differentiation). International Journal of Surgical Oncology 2016; 2016: 1-8.
47. Konuthula N, Iloreta AM, Miles B et al.: Prognostic significance of Kadish staging in esthesioneuroblastoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database. Head & Neck 2017; 39(10): 1962-1968.
otrzymano: 2023-11-06
zaakceptowano do druku: 2023-11-29

Adres do korespondencji:
*Agata Gierlotka
Oddział Otolaryngologii Dziecięcej, Chirurgii Głowy i Szyi Górnośląskie Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka w Katowicach
ul. Medyków 16, 40-752 Katowice
agierlotka@gczd.katowice.pl

New Medicine 4/2023
Strona internetowa czasopisma New Medicine