© Borgis - New Medicine 1/2009, s. 24-28
Empathy in the therapeutic relationship between the physician, nurse, and patient
Vice Head of The Institute of Nursing and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, CMUJ
Katarzyna Wojtas, M.A. Assistant in the Department of Clinical Nursing and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, CMUJ
Prof. Antoni Czupryna, PhD, M.D. Head of The Institute of Nursing and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, CMUJ
This article discusses theoretical concepts defining empathy and its role as a factor necessary for establishing normal social relations, especially in the context of relations with patients. Being aware of the importance of empathy and its use in everyday life by physicians and nurses is fundamental when therapeutic relations and effective care of other people are concerned. A high level of empathy not only allows effective help to be delivered to patients, but it also becomes a significant element affecting an individual´s professional attitude, i.e. it prevents dissatisfaction, lack of professional fulfilment, and emotional burden. Empathy plays a special and vital role in the process of becoming professionally satisfied for both physicians and nurses taking care of those who suffer.
The objective of this work is to analyze empathy presented by physicians and nurses in their therapeutic relationships established with patients. As a result of this analysis, the meaning of empathy in the effective therapeutic relation is described, which proves empathy to be an essential element of the treatment process as well as ensuring quality of care.
Empathy presented by physicians and nurses in their therapeutic contact with a patient comprises the foundation of the therapeutic relation, which should aim at having a positive influence on the patient´s mind and reinforcement of positive emotions, restoring the patient´s internal balance, and preparing him/her for future functioning in the family and professional environment. Work with a patient is undoubtedly very difficult and it requires from carers adequate personal predispositions. Despite continuous progress in medical sciences, the therapeutic contact with a patient and building a dialogue are still fundamental tools in the treatment process and care. The awareness of the therapeutic contact and communication with the patient, based on empathy, has not lost any of its topicality. This point of view should consider professional work of physicians as well as nurses since the coherence of attitudes presented by members of the therapeutic team guarantees a clear message in the process of treatment and care.
The therapeutic contact is a specific kind of relationship defined by the patient´s life situation related to the fact of becoming ill as well as attitudes of carers combined with the context of the situation in which it takes place. This context includes the patient´s perception of the disease, triggered defence mechanisms, and adaptation skills in the situation changed by one´s illness. Competences and interpersonal skills of physicians and nurses cannot be underestimated since thanks to them caregivers get to know their patient and his/her needs, and become ready to establish the therapeutic contact [1, 2].
The specificity of the therapeutic contact results mainly from an appropriate relationship between the nurse and the physician, their readiness and ability to present empathic attitudes towards each other, as well as their awareness of the responsibility they bear for therapeutic actions taken. Only then would the established relation be called „therapeutic”, „having the potential of understanding the patient, discovering his/her real experiences and expectations, and motivating the patient to become active in the process of treatment” . Indicating the helpful character of this relationship proves that the caregiver´s empathy together with the patient´s feelings affects the quality of the developing therapeutic relationship between the carer and the one taken care of .
Empathy is a trait fundamental for physician and nurse professionals. The empathic attitude, meaning the ability of correct perception of verbal and nonverbal signals sent by the patient as well as the ability to assess the patient´s internal status, is an extremely valuable skill when communicating with other people. Understanding patients leads to a deeper interpersonal relationship between the physician, nurse, and patient, and reflects true, mutual, and effective cooperation of all participants of treatment.
The concept of empathy has its source in philosophy and is related to people´s attitudes toward each other, in which kindness and emotional harmony, initially called „liking”, dominate. However, the content of emotional experiences distinguishes it from empathy. Liking reflects acceptance toward the person with whom a relationship is being set whereas empathy means identification of my own feelings with another´s emotion and feelings or participation in another person´s experiences. Lipss directed the definition of empathy to the sphere of psychology. The term „Einfühlung” was translated as empathy or „feeling together with...” . As far as cognitive psychology is concerned, the sense of the discussed issue means the capability to adopt another´s role and point of view. This capability becomes very important, since understanding another person´s feelings and experiences allows one to predict his/her behaviours .
Empathy may also be defined through three different concepts: emotional, cognitive, and emotional-cognitive. When the emotional aspect is considered, empathy concerns harmony, co-experience, and emotional response to another´s experiences. It is emotional experience of the same affective states in a particular situation as those experienced by another person, to whom empathy is directed. This point of view has been presented by many researchers [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13].
Taking into consideration correct prediction of one´s feelings, reflections, and behaviours, the character of empathy is related to the capabilities of perceiving and understanding another´s experiences. These presumptions were applied by researchers presenting a cognitive attitude toward empathy. [14, 15, 16, 17, 18].
Empathy, in the emotional-cognitive concept, becomes an element of cognitive processes which play a mediating role in emotional stimulation, influence correct interpretation of the meaning of a perceived situation, and trigger an emotional reaction determined from the perspective of the other person. Emotional reactions are triggered by the perception of a particular situation or imagining it. Empathy is also described as an emotional-cognitive reaction including an executive component manifesting interpersonal communication [19, 20, 21, 22].
Morse´s concept of empathy seems extremely significant . Empathy is explained on the basis of four components: emotional, moral, cognitive, and behavioural. A fundamental meaning is attributed to the moment of stimulation of emotional empathy as a result of understanding one´s suffering and identifying with this suffering. It motivates the carer to make a conscious decision to recognize suffering and act with empathy or to avoid it and distance oneself from those who suffer.
The moral component or altruistic motivation is triggered by a spontaneous state of emotional excitation, an element of empathy, and results from a conscious decision to participate in another´s suffering. It may also be described as the art of „humanitarian life philosophy” and „deep human wisdom”. The cognitive aspect of empathy assumes that the helping person distances him or herself from emotional mechanisms of empathy and reviews the patient´s situation objectively within the context of social norms and professional knowledge [24, 25]. The behavioural component is understood as the capability of passing and understanding another person´s point of view including numerous communicational programmes (verbal and non-verbal). The authors emphasize the significance of cognitive and behavioural empathy. Also other studies on empathy take into account the behavioural component. Empathy is understood here as an active form, the final phase of an empathic act, where emotional and cognitive factors are transitional phases. The behavioural component, dominating in active empathy, causes the carer to experience not only the emotional status of the other person, but also his/her needs. As a result of this process, the perception of signals about the subject´s status is combined and the needs of the person whose substance is to help others are revised . While analysing the concept of empathy its interpersonal character must be mentioned. This view of the discussed issue allows empathy to be presented as interpersonal communication and activity of prosocial character. However, it does not exclude the value of intrapersonal processes happening in both interacting partners.
When attention is paid to the relationship forming between the physician, nurse, and patient, understanding empathy in all three aspects, i.e. emotional, cognitive, and behavioural, proves to be rational. It is expected to concern the capability of perception and interpretation of the patient´s reactions while being able to modify the caregiver´s own behaviours adequately to the objective needs of the patient.
The therapeutic contact taking empathy under consideration
The therapeutic contact and the relationship evolving between the physician, nurse, and patient comprise the most important elements in care of the patient. They include the creation of emotional bonds necessary for this type of contact . When beginning this therapeutic relationship, physicians and nurses should be aware of the fact that both sides of this specific form of contact must participate in it actively and define the direction of this bond. Creating the relationship becomes a factor motivating the patient to take actions in the process of treatment in order to return to one´s social roles. Therefore, one may say that the ability to start and support the therapeutic relation with the patient is an act of art. Once the therapeutic contact is established, its correctness concerns an adequate attitude toward the patient, the necessity of reinforcing the patient´s dignity and self-esteem .
Powyżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu, do którego możesz uzyskać pełny dostęp.
Mam kod dostępu
- Aby uzyskać płatny dostęp do pełnej treści powyższego artykułu albo wszystkich artykułów (w zależności od wybranej opcji), należy wprowadzić kod.
- Wprowadzając kod, akceptują Państwo treść Regulaminu oraz potwierdzają zapoznanie się z nim.
- Aby kupić kod proszę skorzystać z jednej z poniższych opcji.
- dostęp do tego artykułu
- dostęp na 7 dni
uzyskany kod musi być wprowadzony na stronie artykułu, do którego został wykupiony
- dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
- dostęp na 30 dni
- najpopularniejsza opcja
- dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
- dostęp na 90 dni
- oszczędzasz 28 zł
1. Motyka M: Pielęgnowanie a pomoc psychiczna w chorobie, Centrum Edukacji Medycznej, Warszawa 1999. 2. Motyka M: Komunikacja terapeutyczna; W: Komunikowanie interpersonalne w pielęgniarstwie (red. Kwiatkowska A, Krajewska- Kułak E, Panek W Wydawnictwo Czelej, Lublin, 2003. 3. Wilczek-Rużyczka E: Komunikowanie się z chorym psychicznie, Wydawnictwo Czelej, Lublin, 2007. 4. Wilczek- Rużyczka E: Empatia i jej rozwój osób pomagających, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków, 2002. 5. Kalliopuska M: Holistyczny model empatii. Nowiny Psychologiczne 1994; Nr 4. 6. Scotland E: Empathy, Self- Esteem nad Birth Order. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963; No 3. 7. Roe K: Elary Empathy Development in Children and Subsequent Internalization of Moral Values. Journal of Social Psychology 1980; No 1. 8. Hoffman L: Childhood Experiences and Womens Achievement Motvies. Journal of Social Issues 1971; No1. 9. Gawriłowa T, P: Eksperymentalne badania empatii u dzieci i młodzieży średnim wieku szkolnym. Woprosy Psichołogii 1974; Nr 5. 10. Mehrabian i Epstein: A mesure of Emotional Empathy. Journal of Personalisty 1972; Nr 4. 11. Szewczuk W: Słownik psychologiczny, Warszawa, 1979. 12. Węgliński A: Poziom empatii a zachowanie na koloniach resocjalizacyjnych dzieci zagrożonych demoralizacją. Kwartalnik pedagogiczny 1984; Nr 1. 13. Mazurkiewicz A: Wstęp do psychofizjologii normalnej, Warszawa 1960. 14. Hogan R: Development of Empathy Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1969; vol.33, No3. 15. Truax Ch: The Naeningand and Reliability of Accurate Empathy Reatings. Psychological Bulletin 1972; No 6. 16. Mead G: Mind Self nad Society, Chicago, 1934. 17. Carkhuff R F: Helping and Human Relations. Holt, Reinhard and Winston, New York 1969. 18. Dymond M: Personalisty and empathy. Journal of Consulting Psychology 1950; No 5. 19. Iannotti R, College M: The Nature and Measurement of Empathy in Children. Counseling Psychologist 1975; vol.5, No 2. 20. Feshbach N, D: Empathy in Children. Some Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. The Counseling Psychologist 1975; vol.5, No2, 1975. 21. Eliasz H: O sposobach rozumienia pojęcia "empatia". Przegląd Psychologiczny 1980; Nr, 3. 22. Rembowski J: Empatia, PWN, Warszawa, 1989. 23. Morse J, M, Anderson G, Bottorff J,L, Younga O, O´Brien B, Kolberg S, M, McIlveen K.H: Exploring Empathy. A Conceptual Fit for Nursing Practice? Journal of Nursing Scholarschip, 1992; vol.24, No 4. 24. Brammer L: Helping: What does it mean?; W: The helping relationship process and skills. (red. Brammer L) Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York 1979. 25. Walker L: Independent study by correspondence: Conceptual base for Professional nursing. University of Floryda. Division of Continuning Education, Floryda, 1983. 26. Kondratiewa S,W, Michałczenko G: Formowanie empatii u dzieci w starszym wieku szkolnym orientujących się na zawód nauczycielski. Materiały Międzynarodowej Konferencji Naukowej, Łódź, 1990. 27. Joel L A, Collins D L: Psychiatric nursing: theory and application. New York 1978. 28. Wilczek-Rużyczka E: Komunikowanie Pielęgniarka - pacjent "Pielęgniarka i położna" 2000; (1):10-11. 29. Schoen Johnson B: Psychiatric- Mental Health Nursing. Third Edition, USA J. B. Lippincott Company, USA, 1993. 30. Czerska B: Orientacja na wartości w praktyce onkologa. Wierność. Onkologia w praktyce klinicznej 2006; (2) 3: 95-98.