Ponad 7000 publikacji medycznych!
Statystyki za 2021 rok:
odsłony: 8 805 378
Artykuły w Czytelni Medycznej o SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19

Poniżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu. Informacja nt. dostępu do pełnej treści artykułu
© Borgis - Postępy Nauk Medycznych 10/2015, s. 696-703
*Grażyna Kobus1, Marta Buzun-Milewska2, Jacek Małyszko3, Hanna Bachórzewska-Gajewska1, Jolanta Małyszko4
Transplantacja narządów w opinii pracowników systemu ochrony zdrowia
Organ transplantation – the view of healthcare employees
1Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Medical University, Białystok
Head of Department: prof. Hanna Bachórzewska-Gajewska, MD, PhD
2University Clinical Hospital, Białystok
Hospital Director: Bogusław Poniatowski, MD, PhD
3Department of Nephrology with Dialysis Unit, Medical University, Białystok
Head of Department: prof. Beata Naumnik, MD, PhD
42nd Nephrology Department, Medical University, Białystok
Head of Department: prof. Jolanta Małyszko, MD, PhD
Wstęp. Medycyna transplantacyjna wciąż wyłania szereg problemów natury obyczajowej i etycznej, które dotyczą również pracowników systemu ochrony zdrowia.
Cel pracy. Poznanie postaw i opinii na temat dawstwa narządów i transplantacji wśród pracowników systemu ochrony zdrowia.
Materiał i metody. Badania przeprowadzono z udziałem 262 losowo wybranych pracowników systemu ochrony zdrowia (lekarze, pielęgniarki, położne). Narzędziem badawczym, wykorzystanym do przeprowadzenia badań, był kwestionariusz ankiety.
Wyniki. Pobieranie narządów od dawców żywych akceptowało 100% położnych i pielęgniarek oraz 99% lekarzy; od dawców zmarłych akceptowało 96,16% lekarzy i ok. 95% pielęgniarek i położnych. Na pobranie narządów po śmierci osoby bliskiej nie zgodziłoby się 6,73% lekarzy i 1,86% pielęgniarek. Ok. 90% ankietowanych niezależnie od wykonywanego zawodu zgodziłoby się, aby po ich śmierci pobrano narządy celem przeszczepienia. Przeciwnych było 6,73% lekarzy, 2,8% pielęgniarek i 1,96% położnych.
Wnioski: Pracownicy systemu ochrony zdrowia akceptują pobieranie i przeszczepianie narządów od dawców żywych i zmarłych, jednak akceptacja ta maleje, jeśli dotyka to nas bezpośrednio i w obliczu śmierci bliskiej osoby lub za życia stajemy przed tym bardzo trudnym wyborem.
Introduction. Transplantation medicine is still the source of many moral and ethical issues, which also affect healthcare employees.
Aim. The aim of the work was to learn the attitudes and opinions of healthcare employees concerning donation of organs and transplantation.
Material and methods. The study involved 262 randomly selected healthcare employees (doctors, nurses, and midwives). The research tool used in the study was an original survey questionnaire.
Results. Organ removal from live donors was accepted by 100% of midwives and nurses, and by 99% of doctors, while from deceased donors by 96.16% of doctors and approx. 95% of nurses and midwives. To the removal of organs after the death of a close relative would not give their consent 6.73% of doctors and 1.86% of nurses. About 90% of the participants would agree to have their own organs removed for transplantation after their death, regardless of the profession. Only 6.73% of doctors, 2.8% of nurses and 1.96% of midwives were of the opposite opinion.
Conclusions. Health care employees accept the removal and transplantation of organs from living and cadaveric donors, but the acceptance is lower if the situation affects them directly, when they face this extremely difficult decision in their own lives or in the situation of death of a close relative.

In recent years, the knowledge and awareness of organ donation and transplantation has grown in the society, which has contributed to an increase in the number of transplantations both from living and deceased donors. However, the number of transplantations still does not satisfy the needs of those who are on the waiting lists (1, 2). Although the declared approval for transplantation is quite high, as a community we are still not well prepared to become organ donors after death. The declared positive attitude does not translate into actual acceptance of organ removal (3, 4). Acquiring organs from dead or living persons does not only depend on the attitude of the community but also on the effort of many medical circles, institutions and organizations. It greatly depends on the doctors themselves – on their professionalism, determination, but also sensitivity and psychological skills necessary in a conversation with the family of a potential donor (5). Personal conviction among doctors and nurses and the local environment also play a great role in the process of obtaining organs for transplantation (6). The situation of making the decision about the removal of organs for transplantation after the death of a close relative is not only difficult for the family but also for the medical personnel. One thing that prevents them from establishing contact with the family of the dead one is the fear concerning the person’s dignity, the wish to spare the family traumatic experiences and care about their emotional well-being (7). And although Polish law (8, 9) obliges healthcare centers to make the preliminary qualification of the potential donor and carry out clinical studies, not all hospitals diagnose the death of the brain and appoint a committee to discontinue the treatment and in – the case of lack of contraindications – carry out the removal of organs. One reason for the failure to identify potential donors may be the inability to talk with the dead person’s family about the potential removal, or fear connected with such a conversation, but the local attitude to transplantation, especially in small towns, is also a significant factor. This is no problem in hospitals where many identifications and removals are done, but it is otherwise in small hospitals, where the brain death diagnosis, donor identification and organ removal are very rarely carried out. The medical personnel of those hospitals do not always have knowledge concerning the identification of the potential donor, or experience in difficult conversations with the families. The innovative part of our research is that we decided to study the attitude of midwives, who accompany humans at birth and do not encounter in their work the brain death or the procedure of organ removal and transplantation.
The aim of the work was to learn the attitudes and opinions of health care employees concerning donation of organs and transplantation.
Material and methods
The study involved 262 healthcare employees (doctors, nurses, and midwives) randomly selected from hospitals in Białystok and Ełk. The research tool used in the study was a survey questionnaire. The questions in the questionnaire referred to organ transplantation.
The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Białystok. Each person participating in the study was informed of its purpose and of the anonymity of the survey.
Software such as Excel and Statistica 10.0 from Statsoft was used in the statistical analysis of the collected data. The following tests were used in statistical calculations: the Chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results at the level of p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Differences in the participants’ beliefs concerning transplantation depending on the medical profession and religious practice were investigated in the work.
In the group of 262 participants, there were 40.85% of nurses, 39.68% of doctors and 19.47% of midwives. Women prevailed in the whole study group: 76.72%, compared to 23.28% of men. The mean age of participants was 38.4 ±10.9 years. More than a half (59.92%) of the participants were below 40 years of age, and 40.08% – over 40. The vast majority of the respondents (80%) lived in town. More than a half (62.98%) were married. People who had never married accounted for 27.86%, the divorced ones 6.87%, and widows and widowers 2.29%. The majority of the group composed practicing believers. Atheists accounted for 3.82%. The most common religion among the participants was Catholicism (76.72%); there were 18.70% Orthodox people and 0.76% Protestants.
Acceptance for the transplantation of organs removed from living and deceased donors
Treatment using organs removed from living donors was accepted by all midwives, by 99.0% of nurses and by 97.12% of doctors. The removal and transplantation of organs from deceased donors, was accepted by 96.16% of doctors, 95.33% of nurses and 94.11% of midwives. Doctors significantly more often objected to this method of treatment than nurses (1.92% vs 0.93%; p = 0.0275) (tab. 1).
Table 1. Approval for treatment with the use of organs removed from living and deceased donors.
Approval for treatment with the use of organs removedDoctorNurseMidwifeTotal
From living donors
Definitely yes72.1261.6858.8265.27
Rather yes25.037.3841.1833.21
Hard to say1.920.930.01.14
Rather no0.
Definitely no0.960.00.00.38
From dead donors
Definitely yes72.1254.2156.8661.83
Rather yes24.0441.1237.2533.59
Hard to say0.963.745.883.05
Rather no1.92*0.93*0.01.15
Definitely no0.960.00.00.38
*p = 0.0275 (doctor vs nurse)
Consent to having organs removed from deceased relatives
A significant difference was found between the doctors and the nurses (p = 0.0052). The percentage of people who would allow the removal of organs from deceased close relatives was 86.54% among doctors, 76.47% among midwives and 73.83% among nurses. The mean age of those people was 37.8 ± 11.1 years. About 24% of nurses and midwives, as well as 6.73% of doctors, did not know in what way to answer the question. The mean age of those who could not answer the question was 43.8 ± 9.6 years. 6.73% of doctors and 1.86% of nurses would not agree to the removal of organs after the death of a close relative (tab. 2). The mean age of the opposing ones was 48.8 ± 11.5 years. Nonbelievers more often expressed such a consent than believers did (40% vs 34.92%).
90% of doctors, nurses and midwives would agree to have their organs removed after their own death. The mean age of those people was 37.3 ± 10.7 years. 6.73% of doctors, 2.8% of nurses and 1.96% of midwives were against it. The mean age of these people was 46.0 years (tab. 2).

Powyżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu, do którego możesz uzyskać pełny dostęp.
Mam kod dostępu
  • Aby uzyskać płatny dostęp do pełnej treści powyższego artykułu albo wszystkich artykułów (w zależności od wybranej opcji), należy wprowadzić kod.
  • Wprowadzając kod, akceptują Państwo treść Regulaminu oraz potwierdzają zapoznanie się z nim.
  • Aby kupić kod proszę skorzystać z jednej z poniższych opcji.

Opcja #1


  • dostęp do tego artykułu
  • dostęp na 7 dni

uzyskany kod musi być wprowadzony na stronie artykułu, do którego został wykupiony

Opcja #2


  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 30 dni
  • najpopularniejsza opcja

Opcja #3


  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 90 dni
  • oszczędzasz 28 zł
1. Gorzkowicz B, Majewski W, Tracz E et al.: Opinia na temat dawstwa narządów wśród studentów uczelni wyższych Szczecina. Problemy Pielęgniarstwa 2010; 18(2): 111-116.
2. Głuszek S, Rębak D: Problemy etyczne w chirurgii. Prz Piśm Chir 2009: 1-10.
3. Matych J, Skrzypek-Mikulska A: Prawne zagadnienie transplantacji narządów. Część I. Urologia. Nauka i Praktyka 2009; 55: 16-18.
4. Jurek J, Chwal M, Janusz B et al.: Pobranie narządów po śmierci: psychologiczna sytuacja rodziny, kontekst kulturowy, rola profesjonalistów. Psychoterapia 2011; 4(159): 51-64.
5. Badanie postawy środowiska lekarskiego wobec rozpoznawania śmierci mózgu i pobierania narządów do zmarłych. Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej, Warszawa listopad 2012.
6. Regehr C, Kjerulf M, Popova SR et al.: Trauma and tribulation: the experiences and attitudes of operating room nurses working with organ donors. J Clin Nurs 2004 May; 13(4): 430-437.
7. Thomas SL, Milnes S, Komesaroff PA: Understanding organ donation in the collaborative era: a qualitative study of staff and family experiences. Intern Med J 2009 Sep; 39(9): 588-594.
8. Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 16 lipca 2007 roku w sprawie szczegółowych warunków pobierania, przechowywania i przeszczepiania komórek, tkanek i narządów (Dz. U. 07.138.973 z dn. 1 sierpnia 2007), współdziałania zakładów służby zdrowia w zakresie pobierania, przechowywania komórek, tkanek i narządów w celu ich wykorzystania do przeszczepienia.
9. Ustawa z dnia 1 lipca 2005 r. o pobieraniu, przechowywaniu i przeszczepianiu komórek, tkanek i narządów. Dz. U. 2005 nr 169 poz. 1411.
10. Ozdag N: The nurses knowledge, awareness and acceptance of tissue-organ donation. EDTNA ERCA J 2001; 27(4): 201-206.
11. Sque M, Payne S, Vlachonikolis I: Cadaveric donotransplantation: nurses’ attitudes, knowledge and behaviour. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50(4): 541-552.
12. Akgün HS, Bilgin N, Tokalak I et al.: Organ donation: a cross-sectional survey of the knowledge and personal views of Turkish health care professionals. Transplant Proc 2003; 35(4): 1273-1275.
13. Kim J-RT, Fisher MJ, Elliott D: Undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes towards organ donation in Korea: Implications for education. Nurse Education Today 2006; 26(6): 465-474.
14. Komunikat z badań CBOS: Postawy wobec przeszczepiania narządów. Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej. Warszawa, sierpień 2012, BS/105/2012, 3-17.
15. Kobus G, Popławska W, Zbroch E et al.: Opinions of town residents on organ transplantation. Transplant Proc 2014; 46(8): 2492-2495.
16. Martinez JM, Martin A, López JS: Spanish public opinion concerning organ donation and transplantation. Med Clin (Barc) 1995; 105(11): 401-406.
17. Sanavi S, Afshar R, Lotfizadeh AR, Davati A: Survey of medical students of Shahed University in Iran about attitude and willingness toward organ transplantation. Transplant Proc 2009; 41(5): 1477-1479.
18. Kośmider-Cichocka A: Postawy wobec przeszczepów narządów. Raport z badań. IPSOS, Warszawa, sierpień 2002.
19. Bener A, El-Shoubaki H, Al-Maslamani Y: Do we need to maximize the knowledge and attitude level of physicians and nurses toward organ donation and transplant? Exp Clin Transplant 2008; 6(4): 249-253.
20. Makara-Studzińska M, Kowalska AJ, Jakubowska K: Poziom wiedzy oraz opinie pielęgniarek na temat transplantacji organów. Med Ogólna i Nauki o Zdrowiu 2012; 18(1): 31-36.
21. Rowiński W: Bariery przeszczepiania narządów w Polsce i sposoby ich pokonania. Medycyna Praktyczna 2009; 1: 156-158.
otrzymano: 2015-09-02
zaakceptowano do druku: 2015-09-26

Adres do korespondencji:
*Grażyna Kobus
Faculty of Clinical Medicine Medical University of Białystok
ul. Szpitalna 37, 15-295 Białystok
tel. +48 (85) 685-50-60

Postępy Nauk Medycznych 10/2015
Strona internetowa czasopisma Postępy Nauk Medycznych

Pozostałe artykuły z numeru 10/2015: