© Borgis - New Medicine 1/2013, s. 31-34
*Fabio Gabrielli1, 4, Massimo Cocchi2, Daniel Levi3, Alfredo De Filippo1, 5, Giovanni Broggi6
Historical-anthropological insights on epilepsy from hippocrates to positivism
1Scientific Committee of “Paolo Sotgiu” Institute for Research in Quantitative and Quantum Psychiatry and Cardiology, L. U. de. S. University, Lugano, Switzerland
2Scientific Director of “Paolo Sotgiu” Institute for Research in Quantitative and Quantum Psychiatry and Cardiology, L. U. de. S. University, Lugano, Switzerland
3Department of Neuroscience Applied, L. U. de. S. University, Lugano, Switzerland
4 Faculty of Human Sciences, L. U. de. S. University, Lugano, Switzerland
5Scientific Committee of Department of Legal Studies and Social, L. U. de. S. University, Lugano, Switzerland
6Scientific Director of Department of Neuroscience Applied, L. U. de. S. University, Lugano, Switzerland
The history of epilepsy appears to be mainly a progressive detachment from gods. Hippocratic medicine, for its part, stands out as the first technique (techne) able of unfettering men from the divine by explaining illness with natural and rational laws: the sacred disease, that is to say epilepsy, does not have divine characteristics, but rather a “rational structure” (physin) and “rational causes” (prophasin). Starting right from Hippocrates, we aim at providing a short history of epilepsy ending with the late-nineteenth-century perspective (especially Lombroso) which stated that epileptics didn”t have cerebral disorders or injuries, but they were characterized by a degeneration already affecting their ancestors and detectable by means of anthropometry and skull measurements.
In these few lines, we will mention some critical periods of the history of medicine with reference to epileptic phenomena, leaving your in-depth further investigation to reading of the indicated specialised texts.
Epilepsy, that the Babylonians called miqtu, “disease that makes you fall”, derives its name from the Greek verb epilambanein, “to struck suddenly”, “to take by surprise”.
People were so concerned with its abrupt, violent, sudden, magmatic onset that they saw in epilepsy the characteristics of the gods, of the sacred dimension: caducus, sacer, astralis, demoniacus.
The Babylonians believed that the medical treatment should be practised by a priest through purifications and specific sacrifices: the objective, in particular for mental illness, was to trigger a cathartic, “psychotherapeutic” effect (1).
The epileptic was thought to be a victim of evil forces, to such an extent that the Hammurabi”s Code (1780 BC) forbade epileptics to marry; furthermore, holes were drilled in the epileptics” skulls in order to make the “wicked demon” go away (to learn more about other purification practices and “sacred removal” of epilepsy in ancient times (2, 3).
To summarise, the epileptic was considered as a type of possessed person to be left in the care of a doctor-priest, a privileged guardian of the sacred (the word “sacred” derives from an Indo-European root which means “separated”: a both alluring and repelling power, later defined as “divine”, that religion tries to “rejoin”, re-ligere, by means of practices and rituals, in sacred places ruled by priests who mediate with its immense force (4).
Due to Hippocrates, the thematic perspective changes completely: men relinquish the sacred to rely on the medical technique. Hereafter you will find the excerpt from the Sacred disease: “It is thus with regard to the disease called Sacred: it appears to me to be nowise more divine nor more sacred than other diseases, but has a natural cause from the originates like other affections. Men regard its nature and cause as divine from ignorance and wonder because it is not at all like to other diseases. And this notion of its divinity is kept up by their inability to comprehend it.”(§1, translated by Adams).
The above Hippocratic excerpt represents paradigmatically the founding moment of the human medicine and its emancipation from the Divine (5).
So, medicine is the original form of the technique – in the Cratylus, 414 b-c, Plato says that the term “technique” comes from hexis nou, which means “be the master and make use of one”s own mind”- that frees itself from the divine: the sacred disease (this is the phrase used to indicate epilepsy in ancient times), does not have divine characteristics but rather it has a “rational structure”(physin) and “rational causes” (prophasin).
Epilepsy thus becomes the human, deeply human, pathological archetype, the rational motivation.
Thus epilepsy becomes the human, deeply human, pathological archetype, the rational motivation, clue-by-clue procedure, guesswork, processes involving attempts and confutations (Alcmaeon of Croton used the phrase tekmairestha) (6-8).
The medical art, starting from epilepsy, no longer believes that gods control the space and time where the natural life of man takes place, not even the ancient philosophy of physis which is considered as the principle embracing and sustaining everything (just think about Anaximander, DK 12A15) can do that, and let alone the myth, completely projected towards the past, seen as the founding act of the human. Only technical knowledge is capable of that.
This future-oriented knowledge (prognosis), finds in technique the new Episteme, the Rationale that embodies itself into experience in order to be tested, checked so as to position itself as praxis (5, 9).
In the normal practice, the practitioner does not just occasionally act, but establishes a rational path (prophasin), aimed at harmony leading to health.
In a word, epilepsy has natural causes and so it must be treated with rational techniques aimed at restoring “the right proportion”, the right balance.
According to Hippocratic texts, illness originates from an imbalance between the external environment (weather, air, beverages, food) and the internal environment, that is the human body: the unbalance on bodily “humours” (10); on the humoral unbalance of epilepsy, cf. also Galen, De Locis affectis, III, 9: ed. Kühn, vol. VIII, pp. 176 and sgg; on the epilepsy as the expression of the “melancholic disease”, linked to the black bile, which is one of the four humours, cf. Aristotle, Problema XXX, I).
On the concept of health as harmony, as temperance the Greek moulded one of the most important messages for modern man: man is a whole whose parts are in balance, “right in the middle”, medietas, from which Latins will derive the word “medicine”(Isidoro di Siviglia, Etimologiae od Origines; (11-13).
Galen, additionally, believed that psychic faculties, such as intelligence, memory and will, were determined by the physico-chemical conditions of the brain and, as a consequence, mental disorders were thought to originate from cerebral lesions, from the balance loss. According to Galen, in the wake of Plato”s Timaeus, the brain was the seat of the “rational soul, the starting point of nerves, the origin of voluntary movements (On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato) (10).
In the Galenic conception, disease was considered as dyscrasia, humoral disorder, whereas health was eucrasia, harmony, measure, peaceful coexistence of parts.
Pursuing further this historical overview, it should be noticed that Celsius (III, 23,1) used the phrase comitialis morbus to underline the fact that the epileptic seizure was so serious a problem that meetings could be postponed because of it; in the same way Suetonius (Div. Iul., 45, 2): comitiali quoque morbo bis uinter res agendas correptus est.
So, in ancient Rome, Comitia the oldest Roman assembly – were suspended if one of the participants was struck by epileptics fits. Even Julius Caesar was believed to suffer from epileptic attacks: Plutarch Caesar, 17, 2; 53, 5-6; 60, 6-7; Suetonius, Div. Iul., 45, 2; Appian, Bell. Civ., II, 10).
Here follows a telling testimony to the fact that Julius Caesar could not take part in the battle of Thapsus against Juba in 46 BC: “Others, however, say that Caesar himself was not in the action, but that, as he was marshalling and arraying his army, his usual sickness, epilepsy, laid hold of him, and he, at once aware that it was beginning, before his already wavering senses were altogether confounded and overpowered by the malady, was carried to a neighbouring tower, where he stayed quietly during the battle” (Caesar, 53, 5-6 translated by Perrin).
The advent of the 4th century, the decay of Roman and the Byzantine medicine laid the foundation for demonology. Christian religion brought about the belief that the devil would master every single body part and would prompt illness, especially mental illness. There was a return of magic and, in particular, of the concept of demonic possession, which turned the spotlight on exorcists and the Church, rather than on doctors.
Powyżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu, do którego możesz uzyskać pełny dostęp.
Płatny dostęp tylko do jednego, POWYŻSZEGO artykułu w Czytelni Medycznej
(uzyskany kod musi być wprowadzony na stronie artykułu, do którego został wykupiony)
Płatny dostęp do wszystkich zasobów Czytelni Medycznej