Ponad 7000 publikacji medycznych!
Statystyki za 2021 rok:
odsłony: 8 805 378
Artykuły w Czytelni Medycznej o SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19

Poniżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu. Informacja nt. dostępu do pełnej treści artykułu tutaj
© Borgis - New Medicine 1/2017, s. 14-20 | DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0009.7843
Gábor Kapócs1,2, *Pèter Balázs3
The Health Policy in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Hungary – a review of recent developments
1Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation, St. John’s Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
Head of Department: Professor Tamás Kurimay, MD, PhD
2Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Head of Department: Prof. József Kovács, MD, PhD
3Institute of Public Health, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Head of Department: Prof. Károly Cseh, MD, PhD
Mental health problems affect 10–20% of the pediatric population worldwide, with the same prevalence in both the high-income countries (HICs) and low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). Hungary has a relatively high prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children aged 4-17 (15.8%). Psychiatric problems in children are an important public health issue in all countries, as the early diagnosis is important not only for the current well-being of the child, but also for their social and economic development throughout their entire lifetime. This paper reviews the relevant health policy acts of the Hungarian government that have been released during the previous 15 years. All governmental programs followed the current WHO (World Health Organization) and European Union guidelines, indicating the growing influence of the international organizations on the domestic health policy. What is interesting, earlier programs concentrated on local governments and actions, and more recent documents underline the responsibility and role of the state and central government. When analyzing the health policy documents concerning child and adolescent mental health services, a gap between the growing scientific knowledge and its implementation can be seen. The situation of the Hungarian psychiatry has been worsening from 2006 in terms of the capacity of both the in- and outpatient care. Hungary has yet to fulfill the aims of already existing programs in the day-to-day clinical practice.

For the last ten years, multiple policy documents have been issued in Hungary and High Income Countries (HICs), which indicated the rising awareness of the public, international organizations, governments, professional environments and civil organization on the subject of mental health and psychiatric care of children and adolescents.
The proportion of children (0-14 years) in world’s general population has been decreasing from 1966 (38%) and reached 26.11% in 2015 (1, 2). In Hungary, children represented 25% of the population in 1960 and 15% in 2015 (1, 2). Nearly one third (2.2 billion) of the global population are children and adolescents, but 90% of them live in the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (3).
Mental health problems affect 10-20% of children and adolescents in the world. A systematic review of studies conducted in LMICs confirmed that the prevalence of mental health disorders in LMICs is equal to the prevalence in HICs (4). Reliability of the epidemiological data is of primary importance, as on their basis, policies and decisions concerning allocating resources are made. However, there is concern that mental disorders might be overdiagnosed in developed countries, resulting in misleading epidemiological data (5). Estimating the real prevalence of mental disorders in pediatric population is particularly challenging because of the different data sources and surveillance methods of pediatric mental disorders. Additionally, cultural differences could have broad implications on the estimates (6). Neuropsychiatric disorders are the leading cause of health-related disability during the first three decades of life, accounting for 15–30% of the loss of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) (7). Recent data suggest that currently used approaches underestimate the burden of mental illness by more than a third. Thus, mental illness could be responsible for 32.4% of years lived with disability (YLDs) and 13.0% of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) globally (8). According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, mental disorders and substance abuse disorders are among the leading causes of morbidity, being responsible for 7.4% of DALYs and 22.9% of YLDs worldwide, making them the fifth leading cause of DALYs and the leading cause of YLDs (9).
The Atlas Project of the World Health Organization (WHO) on child and adolescent mental health revealed the real global burden of this medical problem. Around 20% of children and adolescents suffer from mental illnesses that end up in disability. Additionally, 50% of all adult mental disorders may be traced back to the adolescence. There were several shortages identified in services concerning pediatric mental health, especially in LMICs, including lacking human resources, services, training, as well as inadequate health economy and policy (10).
The failure to address mental health problems of children and adolescents in most of the countries is an important public health issue. As a substantial part of adults’ mental health conditions has its onset in the early years of life (11), and the early diagnosis is important not only for the current well-being of the child, but also for their social and economic development throughout their entire lifetime (12). Risk factors for mental conditions can present as early as in the preconceptional period, and they include family history, unplanned pregnancy, maternal prenatal and perinatal physical and mental distress, and adolescent parenting (4). Risk factors that appear in the pre-school and school age include: health and nutrition problems, suboptimal psychosocial and educational environment, being orphaned and/or raised in child protection facilities, bullying, perceived obesity, school difficulties, use of tobacco, alcohol, and drugs (4). Risk factors specific for the adult age include career difficulties, unemployment, and other socioeconomic factors (4). Systematic reviews have shown that the prevalence of mental health problems of children in LMICs resembles the prevalence in HICs (4).
Mental health problems are less visible in the society than physical illnesses due to their nature. Their prevalence, as well as their importance, is often overlooked. However, the influence of poor mental health on physical health causes significant costs to the health care. For this reason, health care providers should raise awareness on mental health issues by integrating them into social policies and health programs (13). Primary care physicians play an important role in diagnosing and initiating the treatment of mental health problems in children and adolescents, especially in rural and under-staffed areas, in which the access to psychiatrists is limited. There is need for more systemized and transparent referral process to other specialists, such as pediatricians, psychologists, and social workers (14). Moreover, all the professionals of the mental health care should also cooperate with employees of other social systems (educational, social care, and juridical systems), which should also have a role in promoting mental health (15).
To establish new programs and develop already existing child and adolescent mental health services, it is essential to understand the decision-making procedures of central governments and the intersectoral competition for financial resources (16). Therefore, there is need to formulate adequate economic arguments to draw the attention of policy makers that can influence resource allocation (16). Studies in HICs have clearly indicated the wide range of long-term consequences of childhood mental health problems, not only concerning the education process (17), but also adult health and labor market conditions (18). Strong economic arguments support the early investment in the mental health of disadvantaged children, for early prevention is often more cost-effective than later remediation (19). Early investments have higher return than those made at a later age (20).
At the beginning of the 2000s, the Atlas of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Resources suggested that governmental child and adolescent mental health policies are rather rare worldwide (21). The United Nations (UN) resolution on a World Fit for Children states that “every child has the right to develop his or her potential to the maximum extent possible to become physically healthy, mentally alert, socially competent, emotionally sound and ready to learn” (1). Unfortunately, this declaration was not followed by the development of specific policies or programs to support the development of pediatric mental health services (22).
The World Report on Violence and Health of the WHO (23) indicated that abuse and negligence in the early life lead to later mental health problems. Following this report, the UN adopted the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability in 2007 (24). The Convention included provisions for persons affected with mental illnesses and intended to influence the country-level advocacy for the development of mental health services for children, as well and for the humane treatment of those with mental health problems – including children and adolescents (24).
Although political will is indispensable for the establishment of child and adolescent mental health policies, the education of the public about the need of such services is also vital (25). Reputable international and professional organizations (The World Psychiatric Association Presidential Program on Child Mental Health – a collaboration between the World Psychiatric Association, WHO, and the International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions) developed an instrument to support the promotion of child and adolescent mental health to develop advocacy programs which could influence the special policies (26).
In spite of growing evidence of the importance of mental health, major international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and agencies (except the WHO) seem to pay little attention to the child and adolescent mental health care. The lack of specific interventions may result in long-term negative effects on educational attainment, chronic disability and lost productivity. The policy development depends not only on the mobilization of financial resources, but also on the mobilization of potential stakeholders (27).
In the USA, the child and adolescent mental health services have been significantly developing in the last decades, but in spite of this, only 20% of children and adolescents in need of psychiatric treatment received help, leaving 80% of children and adolescents with psychiatric illnesses untreated (28). It has been pointed out that in the future, more emphasis in the child and adolescent psychiatry should be put on providing services for a larger amount of patients for less money. As the authors of the study formulate it, “patients should flow seamlessly from the community into child and adolescent psychiatric services and back, and from one program to another, with evidence of constant care coordination and an emphasis on quality. Available resources should follow patient demand so that we can be responsive to populations and to immediate clinical need” (28).
Clinical Centers of Excellence support evidence-based care at the national level. They promote mental health and help establish national health policies to raise public awareness and foster public advocacy related to the mental health of children, adolescents and their families (29).
Material and Methods
In order to compare the health policy acts of the Hungarian government with the worldwide trends in child and adolescent psychiatry, we analyzed the governments’ programs. We analyzed four basic programs of successive Hungarian governments:
1. National Program of the Decade of Health (30),
2. Our Children Our Treasures – National Infant and Child Health Program (31),
3. Semmelweis’ Plan for Saving the Health System – Revitalization and Treatment (32),
4. Healthy Hungary 2014-2020 (33).
National Program of the Decade of Health (30)

Powyżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu, do którego możesz uzyskać pełny dostęp.
Mam kod dostępu
  • Aby uzyskać płatny dostęp do pełnej treści powyższego artykułu albo wszystkich artykułów (w zależności od wybranej opcji), należy wprowadzić kod.
  • Wprowadzając kod, akceptują Państwo treść Regulaminu oraz potwierdzają zapoznanie się z nim.
  • Aby kupić kod proszę skorzystać z jednej z poniższych opcji.

Opcja #1


  • dostęp do tego artykułu
  • dostęp na 7 dni

uzyskany kod musi być wprowadzony na stronie artykułu, do którego został wykupiony

Opcja #2


  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 30 dni
  • najpopularniejsza opcja

Opcja #3


  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 90 dni
  • oszczędzasz 28 zł
1. UN: Convention on the Rights of the Child. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989 entry into force 2 September 1990, in accordance with article http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf
2. The World Bank: Data, Population ages 0-14 (% of total) - 2015, http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.0014.TO.ZS?end=2015&start=2015&view=bar
3. UNICEF: Progress for Children. A report card on adolescents United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Number 10, April 2012, ISBN: 978-92-806-4629-0 eISBN: 978-92-806-4634-4.
4. Kieling C, Baker-Henningham H, Belfer M et al.: Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. Lancet 2011; 378: 1515-1525.
5. Merten EC, Cwik JC, Margraf J et al.: Overdiagnosis of mental disorders in children and adolescents (in developed countries). Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2017; 11: 5.
6. Holbrook JR, Bitsko RH, Danielson ML et al.: Interpreting the Prevalence of Mental Disorders in Children: Tribulation and Triangulation. Health Promot Pract 2017; 18: 5-7.
7. Lopez AD: Disease Control Priorities Project. Oxford University Press New York, NY and Washington, DC, World Bank, Global burden of disease and risk factors, 2006.
8. Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R: Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3: 171-178.
9. Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J et al.: The Global Burden of Mental and Substance Use Disorders, 2010. Lancet 2013; 382: 1575-1586.
10. Belfer ML: Child and adolescent mental disorders: the magnitude of the problem across the globe. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008; 49: 226-236.
11. Kessler RC, Angermeyer M, Anthony J C et al.: Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry 2007; 6: 168-176.
12. Sachs JD, McArthur JW: The Millennium Project: a plan for meeting the Millennium Development Goals. Lancet 2005; 365: 347-353.
13. Prince M, Patel V, Saxena S et al.: No health without mental health. Lancet 2007; 370: 859-877.
14. Zayed R, Davidson B, Nadeau L et al.: Canadian rural/remote primary care physicians perspectives on child/adolescent mental health care service delivery. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016; 25: 24-34.
15. Goodman R: Child mental health: who is responsible? BMJ 1997; 314: 813-814.
16. Harper G, Cetin FC: Child and adolescent mental health policy: promise to provision. Int Rev Psychiatry 2008; 20: 217-224.
17. Currie J, Stabile M: Mental health in childhood and human capital. In: Gruber J, ed. The problems of disadvantaged youth: an economic perspective. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2009.
18. Conti G, Heckmann JJ, Urzua S: The educational-health gradient. Am Econ Rev 2010; 100: 234-238.
19. Carneiro P, Heckman J: Human capital policy. Nber Working Paper Series, Working Paper 9495,National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA, 2003. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9495
20. Doyle O, Harmon CP, Heckman JJ, Tremblay RE: Investing in early human development: timing and economic efficiency. Econ Hum Biol 2009; 7: 1-6.
21. Shatkin J, Belfer M: The global absence of child and adolescent mental health policy. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2004; 9: 104-108.
22. Belfer ML, Saxena S: WHO Child Atlas project. Lancet 2006; 367: 551-552.
23. Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA et al.: World report on violence and health. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/world_report/en/
24. United Nations: Convention on the rights of persons with disability, 2007. http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
25. Richmond J, Kotelchuk M: Political influences: re-thinking national health policy. Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1983.
26. Hoven CW, Doan T, Musa GJ et al.: Worldwide child and adolescent mental health begins with awareness: a preliminary assessment in nine countries. Int Rev Psychiatry, 2008; 20: 261-270.
27. Funk M, Minoletti A, Drew N et al.: Advocacy for mental health: roles for consumer and family organizations and governments. Health Promot Int, 2006; 21: 70-75.
28. Houston JM, Martini DR: The Delivery of Mental Health Care: Where Are We and Where Are We Going? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2013; 52: 1128-1130.
29. Tamminen T: Child and adolescent psychiatry in Europe. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011; 20: 495-496.
30. Hungarian Parliament: National Program of the “Decade of Health”. Parliamentary decision No. 46/2003. (April 16, 2003.) http://mkogy.jogtar.hu/?page=show&docid=a03h0046.OGY
31. Hungarian Ministry of Health: “Our Children Our Treasures” – National Infant and Child Health Program („Ko?zo?s kincsu?nk a gyermek” Nemzeti Csecsemő- e?s Gyermekege?szse?gu?gyi Program), Ministry of Health, Republic of Hungary, November 2005, http://www.ogyei.hu/upload/files/Közös%20kincsünk%20a%20gyermek.pdf
32. Health Secretary of Ministry of National Resources: „Semmelweis Plan for Saving the Health System – Revitalization and Treatment”. The Health Secretary of Ministry of National Resources, Budapest, May 2011. http://2010-2014.kormany.hu/download/5/e7/30000/Semmelweis%20Terv%20az%20egèszsègügy%20megmentèsère%20-%20Szakmai%20koncepció.pdf
33. Health Secretary of Ministry of Human Resources: „Healthy Hungary 2014-2020“ The Health Secretary of Ministry of Human Resources, Budapest, January 2015. https://www.aeek.hu/documents/20182/0/Egèszsèges+Magyarország+stratègia/af67e108-7f2e-437c-bf2f-d16590cf3a7f
34. WHO Europe: Mental health: facing the challenges, building solutions. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Report from the WHO European Ministerial Conference, 2005. http://www.euro.who.int/main/WHO/Home/TopPage
35. Hungarian State Audit Office: Report of the State Audit Office of Hungary about the re-organization of mental health services. No. 1286, Hungarian State Audit Office, Budapest, 2012. https://asz.hu/storage/files/files/Összes%20jelentès/2012/1286j000.pdf
otrzymano: 2017-02-06
zaakceptowano do druku: 2017-03-01

Adres do korespondencji:
*Pèter Balázs
Institute of Public Health Semmelweis University
4 Nagyvárad Sq., 1089 Budapest, Hungary
tel. +36-204-511-506
e-mail: balazs-peter@windowslive.com

New Medicine 1/2017
Strona internetowa czasopisma New Medicine