Ponad 7000 publikacji medycznych!
Statystyki za 2021 rok:
odsłony: 8 805 378
Artykuły w Czytelni Medycznej o SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19

Poniżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu. Informacja nt. dostępu do pełnej treści artykułu
© Borgis - Nowa Stomatologia 4/2016, s. 253-261 | DOI: 10.5604/14266911.1231641
Karolina Kaczor1, Anna Zawadzka1, *Piotr Rożniatowski2, Emil Korporowicz2, Dorota Olczak-Kowalczyk2
Complications of piercing in the oral cavity – a review
Powikłania piercingu w obrębie jamy ustnej – przegląd piśmiennictwa
1Students’ Research Circle, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Medical University of Warsaw
2Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Medical University of Warsaw
Head of Department: Professor Dorota Olczak-Kowalczyk, MD, PhD
Piercing jest coraz częściej spotykaną formą ozdabiania ciała zarówno wśród młodzieży, jak i młodych dorosłych. Jednym z miejsc, w których spotyka się różnego rodzaju kolczyki, jest jama ustna, szczególnie język i wargi. Z uwagi na to, lekarze dentyści powinni potrafić diagnozować i leczyć ewentualne powikłania, które często jako pierwsi rozpoznają. Powikłania można podzielić na: wczesne pozabiegowe, takie jak: obrzęk, ból, przedłużone krwawienie, oraz przewlekłe, gdzie wyróżniamy: recesje dziąsłowe, uszkodzenia tkanek zębów i nawracające infekcje w okolicy kolczyka. Istnieją także doniesienia o powikłaniach ogólnoustrojowych wymagających hospitalizacji, zagrażających życiu, jak infekcyjne zapalenie wsierdzia po zabiegu piercingu czy obrzęk języka prowadzący do duszności. Większość zabiegów kolczykowania jest przeprowadzana w studiach piercingu, w warunkach braku kontroli sterylizacji, co dodatkowo zwiększa ryzyko wystąpienia powikłań. Celem pracy było przedstawienie aktualnej wiedzy na temat powikłań użytkowania piercingu w obrębie jamy ustnej. Lekarz dentysta mogący mieć kontakt z pacjentami z biżuterią nazębną powinien potrafić rozpoznawać i leczyć powikłania, udzielać wskazań higienicznych, a także pomóc podjąć świadomą decyzję pacjentom planującym wykonanie piercingu w obrębie jamy ustnej.
Słowa kluczowe
Piercing is a form of body art increasingly popular among teenagers and young adults nowadays. Oral cavity, especially tongue and lips, is where piercing is placed. Because of that, dentists should be able to diagnose and treat possible complications, which they can see as the first person. There are early (acute) complications, like swelling, pain, prolonged bleeding, and chronic complications, such as dental recession, tooth damage and recurring infections around the piercing. There are reports about systemic complications when hospitalization is needed, life-threatening like infective endocarditis after piercing treatment or tongue swelling with following airway compromise. Most of piercings are placed in piercing studio with no sterilization control what can increase complications possibility. The aim of this study was to present the actual knowledge about complications of using oral piercing. Dentists who can treat patients with oral piercing, should know how to diagnose, treat piercing complications and help maintaining good oral hygiene. They also should know how to help patients who plan oral piercing procedures to make an informed decision.

Modification in human body appearance has not been initiated in the contemporary world. It was a practice present as early as in antiquity in various cultures giving voice to the previous customs and traditions (1). One of the forms of body art is oral cavity piercing and the application of tooth jewellery which has recently become more and more widespread among teenagers and young adults in developing countries. Great interest in piercing is related to the prevailing fashion and aesthetic reasons (2, 3), the willingness of young people to belong to a group or express themselves, yet there are also sexual motives specified and confrontation (4, 5).
Owing to the growing number of young patients with piercing in the oral cavity, a dentist should be able to provide the patient with professional information as well as be prepared to find and treat common piercing complications (6). The goal of the work is to present state-of-the-art as regards piercing and jewellery within the oral cavity on the basis of a review of available references, with particular attention paid to early and late piercing complications.
General information concerning piercing
Piercing within the oral cavity is present among women more often than men, who – on the other hand – more often have several rings. In the majority of cases these are habitual smokers (1, 5-8). Patients usually find no motive at all for the selection of piercing location, specifying their decision to be a whim, unpredictable decision (4). On the basis of multiple studies, it may be stated that most often rings are placed in the tongue, usually in the median sulcus, and later in lips; the remaining locations one can find jewellery in are the frenula, cheeks and the uvula (5-7, 9, 10).
The most common type of rings are barbell (a bar ended with a ball on both sides), the second most common being labret (a bar with a ball on one side and flat on the other). Ring-type rings are most common within the lips (open circle with a ball on one or both the ends) (7). Ziebolz et al. report that the most common rings among teenagers include ball-shaped and cone-shaped rings made of titanium, stainless steel or acrylic (2, 6). What is important is that jewellery may be made of other metals, such as nickel, or may contain their admixtures (7). It has been proven that the society has a negative opinion as regards pierced people. Concerned about stereotypical perception by the dentist, patients would often take out the rings when they have an appointment, which makes it more difficult for the dentist to combine the symptoms present in the oral cavity and the patient using piercing (5). It is suggested that a survey for patients reporting to the dentist should contain questions concerning the presence of piercing in the oral cavity taking into account the period of time the jewellery being discussed has been used for (11).
Piercing is considered an invasive method of body decoration. It requires interrupting the continuity of the skin and mucous membranes, which gives way for pathogenic germs to easily enter the body. Owing to the anatomy of the head and the neck, the infections started may rapidly and aggressively permeate to adjoining areas leading to some dangerous complications (12).
Oral cavity piercing complications concerning both the mucous membrane and the tissues of the teeth have been divided into early (acute) and late (chronic) (13).
In almost all the patients, following piercing in the oral cavity, there are early complications observable after less than 24 hours since the procedure (7, 14). This group includes pain, oedema, bleeding and local infections. Owing to its anatomy and abundant vascularisation, the tongue is particularly susceptible to the occurrence of complications, also life-threatening ones (9, 12). Following tongue piercing procedure, there is a high probability of lingual pain and oedema, which leads to problems eating, speaking (15) and swallowing (3, 14). On the other hand, in the case of a procedure within the lips there is oedema, bleeding and mild infections (6). In the study of López-Jornet et al., pain following the procedure was determined by the patients to be on average 4 in the 0-10 VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). The complaint most often persisted up to one week following the procedure. Rare symptoms include increased saliva outflow (3, 4, 8, 16), irritation and contact allergic reactions within the cutaneous layer of the lip, especially when the ring is made of nickle (7-9) or it has some admixture of palladium (17), metallic taste in the mouth (4, 18). Early complications usually subside of their own, on average after approx. 2 weeks (7), although some research show that the period of healing amounted to approx. 4 weeks in the case of tongue piercing and 5 weeks for the lip (16).
There has been a retrospective analysis carried out in the USA concerning pierced patients reporting to the Emergency Unit in the period 2002-2008, the majority of cases was caused by infections (frequently applied to the tongue) in the vicinity of the rings, local wounds (comparably the tongue and lip) and mechanical traumas in the area of the ring. 91% of the traumas (out of n = 24 459) took place within the first 30 days following ring location and the majority of visits took place in the first week following the procedure. The most serious cases were episodes of life-threatening dyspnoea in patients following tongue piercing, caused by infections or inflammation and oedema of the tongue, 300 patients (1%) required inpatient stay after such an incident (19).
Out of the reports concerning piercing-related complications threatening the life of a patient, one should pay attention to: prolonged post-procedure bleeding, herpes virus infection, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV (15), problems breathing caused by increased oedema of the tongue or ring aspiration to the respiratory tract (14), tongue tissue necrosis, tongue abscess, tetanus infection (20), facial paralysis and infectious endocarditis (7, 9, 12). In the period of 1985-2007 there were at least 22 cases described of infectious endocarditis following piercing, out of which 7 applied to the tongue and 1 to the lip (21), which were caused by Streptococcus viridans (22), Neisseria mucosa (23), Haemophilus aphrophilus (24), Staphylococcus aureus (25). Literature also shows the case of a 25-year-old patient in whom – 4 days following the insertion of a tongue ring – tongue and floor of the mouth pain and oedema were observed, persisting after antibiotics therapy administered (amoxicillin 500 mg 3/days after the procedure). Dysphagia was observed, pyrexia and both sided oedema of the submental and submandibular areas, inside the mouth there was an advancing necrosis of the tissues of the floor of the mouth. Ludwig’s angina was diagnosed, in such a case inpatient treatment was necessary as well as intubation, surgical excision of necrotic tissues and the ring, drainage application and antibiotics therapy (26).

Powyżej zamieściliśmy fragment artykułu, do którego możesz uzyskać pełny dostęp.
Mam kod dostępu
  • Aby uzyskać płatny dostęp do pełnej treści powyższego artykułu albo wszystkich artykułów (w zależności od wybranej opcji), należy wprowadzić kod.
  • Wprowadzając kod, akceptują Państwo treść Regulaminu oraz potwierdzają zapoznanie się z nim.
  • Aby kupić kod proszę skorzystać z jednej z poniższych opcji.

Opcja #1


  • dostęp do tego artykułu
  • dostęp na 7 dni

uzyskany kod musi być wprowadzony na stronie artykułu, do którego został wykupiony

Opcja #2


  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 30 dni
  • najpopularniejsza opcja

Opcja #3


  • dostęp do tego i pozostałych ponad 7000 artykułów
  • dostęp na 90 dni
  • oszczędzasz 28 zł
1. Leichter JW, Monteith BD: Prevalence and risk of traumatic gingival recession following elective lip piercing. Dent Traumatol 2006; 22(1): 7-13. 2. Ziebolz D, Hildebrand A, Proff P et al.: Long-term effects of tongue piercing – a case control study. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 16(1): 231-237. 3. Garcia-Pola MJ, Garcia-Martin JM, Varela-Centelles P et al.: Oral and facial piercing: associated complications and clinical repercussion. Quintessence Int Berl Ger 2008; 39(1): 51-59. 4. López-Jornet P, Navarro-Guardiola C, Camacho-Alonso F et al.: Oral and facial piercings: a case series and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol 2006; 45(7): 805-809. 5. Plastargias I, Sakellari D: The consequences of tongue piercing on oral and periodontal tissues. ISRN Dent 2014; 2014: 876510. 6. Kapferer I, Berger K, Stuerz K, Beier US: Self-reported complications with lip and tongue piercing. Quintessence Int Berl Ger 2010; 41(9): 731-737. 7. De Moor RJG, De Witte AMJC, Delmè KIM et al.: Dental and oral complications of lip and tongue piercings. Br Dent J 2005; 199(8): 506-509. 8. Ventä I, Lakoma A, Haahtela S et al.: Oral piercings among first-year university students. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology 2005; 99(5): 546-549. 9. Maheu-Robert L-F, Andrian E, Grenier D: Overview of complications secondary to tongue and lip piercings. J Can Dent Assoc 2007; 73(4): 327-331. 10. Firoozmand LM, Paschotto DR, Almeida JD: Oral piercing complications among teenage students. Oral Health Prev Dent 2009; 7(1): 77-81. 11. Kretchmer MC, Moriarty JD: Metal piercing through the tongue and localized loss of attachment: a case report. J Periodontol 2001; 72(6): 831-833. 12. Smith RA, Wang J, Sidal T: Complications and implications of body piercing in the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 10(3): 199-205. 13. Campbell A, Moore A, Williams E et al.: Tongue piercing: impact of time and barbell stem length on lingual gingival recession and tooth chipping. J Periodontol 2002; 73(3): 289-297. 14. Stead LR, Williams JV, Williams AC, Robinson CM: An investigation into the practice of tongue piercing in the South West of England. Br Dent J 2006; 200(2): 103-107. 15. Farah CS, Harmon DM: Tongue piercing: case report and review of current practice. Aust Dent J 1998; 43(6): 387-389. 16. Boardman R, Smith R: Dental implications of oral piercing. Oral Health 1997; 87(10): 23. 17. Durosaro O, El-Azhary RA: A 10-year retrospective study on palladium sensitivity. Dermat Contact Atopic Occup Drug 2009; 20(4): 208-213. 18. López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F: Oral and dental complications of intra-oral piercing. J Adolesc Health 2006; 39(5): 767-769. 19. Gill JB, Karp JM, Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT: Oral piercing injuries treated in united States emergency departments, 2002-2008. Pediatr Dent 2012; 34(1): 56-60. 20. Dyce O, Bruno JR, Hong D et al.: Tongue piercing. The new „rusty nail”? Head Neck 2000; 22(7): 728-732. 21. Armstrong ML, Deboer S, Cetta F: Infective endocarditis after body art: a review of the literature andconcerns. J Adolesc Health 2008; 43(3): 217-225. 22. Lick SD, Edozie SN, Woodside KJ, Conti VR: Streptococcus viridans endocarditis from tongue piercing. J Emerg Med 2005; 29(1): 57-59. 23. Tronel H, Chaudemanche H, Pechier N et al.: Endocarditis due to Neisseria mucosa after tongue piercing. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2001; 7(5): 275-276. 24. Akhondi H, Rahimi AR: Haemophilus aphrophilus endocarditis after tongue piercing. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8(8): 850-851. 25. Dubose CJ, Pratt LC (Sel) JW: Victim of fashion: Endocarditis after oral piercing. Curr Surg 2004; 61(5): 474-477. 26. Perkins CS, Meisner J, Harrison JM: A complication of tongue piercing. Br Dent J 1997; 182(4): 147-148. 27. Miller PD: A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985; 5(2): 8-13. 28. Kieser JA, Thomson WM, Koopu P, Quick AN: Oral piercing and oral trauma in a New Zealand sample. Dent Traumatol 2005; 21(5): 254-257. 29. Dibart S, De Feo P, Surabian G et al.: Oral piercing and gingival recession: review of the literature and a case report. Quintessence Int Berl Ger 2002; 33(2): 110-112. 30. Sardella A, Pedrinazzi M, Bez C et al.: Labial piercing resulting in gingival recession. A case series. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29(10): 961-963. 31. Inchingolo F: Oral piercing and oral diseases: a short time retrospective study. Int J Med Sci 2011; 8(8): 649-652. 32. DiAngelis AJ: The lingual barbell: a new etiology for the cracked-tooth syndrome. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128(10): 1438-1439. 33. Levin L, Zadik Y, Becker T: Oral and dental complications of intra-oral piercing. Dent Traumatol Off Publ Int Assoc Dent Traumatol 2005; 21(6): 341-343. 34. Brennan M, O’Connell B, O’Sullivan M: Multiple dental fractures following tongue barbell placement: a case report. Dent Traumatol 2006; 22(1): 41-43. 35. Theodossy T: A complication of tongue piercing. A case report and review of the literature. Br Dent J 2003; 194(10): 551-552. 36. ADA Statement on Intraoral/Perioral Piercing and Tongue Splitting [Internet]; http://www.ada.org/en/member-center/oral-health-topics/oral-piercing. 37. Policy on Intraoral/Perioral Piercing and Oral Jewelry/Accessories. Pediatr Dent 2015; 37(6): 69-70.
otrzymano: 2016-11-03
zaakceptowano do druku: 2016-11-29

Adres do korespondencji:
*Piotr Rożniatowski
Zakład Stomatologii Dziecięcej WUM
Miodowa 18, 00-246 Warszawa
tel. +48 (22) 502-20-31

Nowa Stomatologia 4/2016
Strona internetowa czasopisma Nowa Stomatologia